This is an opinion type question. Close air support was used in the European theater as well as in the Pacific. Also used were USAAF medium & heavy bombers in both theaters. At the Normandy Beaches on D-Day, the German fortifications were heavily protected from the rockets & bombs usually used in close-air support. The US Marines & US Army in the Pacific used close air support after landing to assist their advances. It was difficult for close-air support strikes to knock-out Japanese & German fortifications directly. Close-air support was often used as mobile artillery, because the landing forces had not yet landed their artillery. You are correct that the enemy beach defenses at Normandy, especially at Omaha Beach, were not sufficiently degraded before or during the landings. In the days before precision guided munitions, this was a tough challenge. In hindsight, maybe something could have been improved. I tend to think that naval gunfire at closer range would have been more useful.
Other things to keep in mind about the Normandy invasion: The Allies could not give away the time/date and the location of the landing site by bombing or shelling Normandy fortifications more than a few hours before the landing. The Germans could reinforce the beach defenses with troops & equipment dozens of miles away as soon as the location is known. In the Pacific island invasions, the bombing & shelling of Japanese positions could & often did take place weeks, days & hours ahead of the landings, and the Japanese could do very little to reinforce the troops on the ground because the US Navy isolated the target. Despite all the apparent heavy firepower & heavy bombardments on both German & Japanese positions, it required a direct & penetrating hit by large armor piercing or high explosive shells/bombs on the defensive fortification to knock it out. US Close air-support aircraft in WW2 generally did not carry large enough rockets or bombs to destroy these very hardened targets. US Navy Dive-bombers with 1400 ib. armor-piercing bombs in-theory could do the job if they were especially accurate. German AA fire was much more effective & dangerous than Japanese AA fire, making accuracy from aircraft a problem.
There is a variety of food eaten in the Marines nowadays. There are professional cooks employed to cook healthy meals for the marines, ranging from grains, to meats and vegetables.
For US Sailors it was a WESTPAC cruise (Western Pacific) which sometimes averaged less than a year. For US Soldiers it was a year's tour. For US Marines the same, but could be compatible with US Navy tours as US Marines were also stationed on warships. US Airmen stationed in Thailand (operating fighter bombers and bombers (B52 Stratofortress's) tours could be one or more years.
This Answer Came Directly Form The World History Textbook ,The US Landed At Guadalcanal In The Solomon Islands.They Began Island Hopping .American Forces Gradually Moved North Toward Japan Itself.By 1944 , American Bombers Pounded Japanese Cities & Industries
There were 241 US servicemen killed, an additional 58 French servicemen, 6 civilians and the two suicide bombers on 23 October 1983 at the American Marine Barracks in Lebanon. The US Marines lost 220 men, the US Navy lost 18 and the US Army lost 3 men.
Because they have better training and firepower against the drug cartels.
Marines fly the F/A 18 which is an attack bomber in some roles.
None. Dedicated bombers are exclusively the domain of the Air Force. Fighter/Bombers and attack aircraft can be found in the Air Force, Navy, and Marines. The US Army has no such aircraft.
There is a variety of food eaten in the Marines nowadays. There are professional cooks employed to cook healthy meals for the marines, ranging from grains, to meats and vegetables.
There is a variety of food eaten in the Marines nowadays. There are professional cooks employed to cook healthy meals for the marines, ranging from grains, to meats and vegetables.
1. Deploying US Marines instead of Special Ops men. 2. Deploying standard (conventional) US Army Infantry battalions, Artillery battalions, Armor (tank) battalions, Cavalry Squadrons, etc., instead of Special Ops men. 3. Bombing strategic targets (in North Vietnam) with heavy, medium, and light bombers; instead of parachuting (insertion teams) Special Ops commandos.
1. Deploying US Marines instead of Special Ops men. 2. Deploying standard (conventional) US Army Infantry battalions, Artillery battalions, Armor (tank) battalions, Cavalry Squadrons, etc., instead of Special Ops men. 3. Bombing strategic targets (in North Vietnam) with heavy, medium, and light bombers; instead of parachuting (insertion teams) Special Ops commandos.
For US Sailors it was a WESTPAC cruise (Western Pacific) which sometimes averaged less than a year. For US Soldiers it was a year's tour. For US Marines the same, but could be compatible with US Navy tours as US Marines were also stationed on warships. US Airmen stationed in Thailand (operating fighter bombers and bombers (B52 Stratofortress's) tours could be one or more years.
The Barbary Pirates
Yes, they were used by the Marines against the Barbary Piirates iin Libya.
This Answer Came Directly Form The World History Textbook ,The US Landed At Guadalcanal In The Solomon Islands.They Began Island Hopping .American Forces Gradually Moved North Toward Japan Itself.By 1944 , American Bombers Pounded Japanese Cities & Industries
The Lebanon barracks bombing took the lives of 241 American Military, 58 French military, 6 civilians and the 2 suicide bombers. There were also 75 others wounded.
There were 241 US servicemen killed, an additional 58 French servicemen, 6 civilians and the two suicide bombers on 23 October 1983 at the American Marine Barracks in Lebanon. The US Marines lost 220 men, the US Navy lost 18 and the US Army lost 3 men.