Lots. There are a lot of variables to consider. What size artillery shell? What type of fuze? How close are the soldiers to each other? What sort of protection do they have? A large shell with an air burst over closely packed troops could easily kill dozens and wound dozens more. A small shell landing in a fox hole might only kill the soldier in that hole.
World War I Artillery varied in size. The French used a very effective small field gun, and the German Army had a Big Bertha or Paris Gun with a very heavy projectile. (Rail Road Gun). Most artillery was used for barrage engagements. Softening up the defenses before an assault. These barrages included shells designed to strike and penetrate bunkers, but also shells that "air-burst" to harm large numbers of exposed troops. Perhaps the greatest number of injuries was caused by gas bombardment. Naval weaponry was generally larger than that used by land forces but was more likely used for armor piercing roles against other ships than coastal bombardment. The most deadly I believe would have been the air-burst shrapnel shells, but again, the density in personel in the kill zone of the shell would be the governing factor. For the trench warfare of WW I, the machine gun was the worst to face. Recollections and distillations and opinion expressed from my 2nd hand knowledge. History channel etc. Hope this starts an answer for you.
Over 9,000
That answer is, of course, correct - there were more than 9,000 artillery shells fired during WWII - way, way, way over. Artillery came in a wide range of sizes. There were bombardments that lasted for days and longer. According to the BBC, the Russians used 40,000 artillery pieces in the battle for Berlin alone.
I suspect the true answer is in the hundreds of billions, if not higher.
I read somewhere that at the Battle of Verdun, 200 artillery shells were fired for every man killed (by all causes). Richard Fencel
8 billion
1
A whole lot
IN TOTAL FOR THOSE 4 YEARS
Gub
a weapon used in the war
The most common one that was used as a weapon in World War 1 is called the Artillery
No :/ Tanks, artillery and fighter planes could all top both the firepower and Anti-Tank/Infantry capabilities of this weapon. :P
Probably artillery; it was responsible for many of the deaths in World War 1.
Big guns (i.e. artillery, not hand weapons).
In World War 1 around 8,500,000 soilders died during World War One. Now artillery killed the most people in World War 1. But to be totally honest it is impossible to know exactly how many people died because of Artillery in World War 1. Studies have shown however that around 65% of all deaths during World War One were caused by artillery. If we do the math this comes out to around 5,525,000 people. So to answer your question no-one really knows but peoples best guess is that 4.5 to 5.5 million people died because of artillery in World War One.
the enimeys could take pisc and then send it to there people to learn your territory better
The World War I zeppelins were large blimps used to gain information from over enemy lines, but were slow and easy targets for artillery guns.
A survey taken among soldiers and their commanding officers after World War I voted the machine gun the most effective/devastating weapon of that war. A similar study done after WW II named field artillery to this dubious honor.
New- Poison gas, tanks, airplanes Improved- Machine guns, artillery, submarines, dirigibles, and small arms.
Artillery was the primary counter-trench warfare weapon because the only way to really be assured of killing guys in a trench is to use a weapon whose projectiles travel in an arc. The Germans had an interesting tactic: they set mortar bombs for impact burst (which means they explode when they hit, not before) and tried to drop them into the Allied trenches. It didn't succeed often because mortars are famously inaccurate, but when it did it killed a lot of people. The Allies, who were mostly using French guns, would set their rounds to explode over the trenches. Since overhead cover hadn't been invented yet, this was more successful.