All the controversy over the meaning and usefulness of IQ aside, the average IQ is 100 by definition. The distribution of IQ appears to follow a normal (bell) curve and therefore the well understood characteristics of normal curves allow us to make some good estimates. Considering this definition, average performance on an IQ measure (a measure or an instrument- not a test- that has good validity and reliability) is always 100. There will always be, even if the general 'intelligence' of the population is changing, 50% of the population above average and 50% below average. From here you decide what you mean by "low IQ".
It seems unreasonable to assume that any IQ below 100 should be defined as 'low', since we are talking about part of the normal curve of intelligence where the great majority of people fall. Also, no person would consider an IQ of 105 to be 'high', so it is callous and ignorant to consider an IQ of 95 to be 'low'. You might define (it is mostly arbitrary) the average range of IQ as falling within one standard deviation of the mean (85 to 115), or perhaps one and a half standard deviations (roughly 78 to 122).
Usually the standard deviation of IQ is defined as 15. Then by studying the characteristics of normal curves you can arrive at a reasonably good estimate of the percent of individuals who would fall below your arbitrary cut-off. Considering the range of one standard deviation above and below average, IQ's of 85 to 115, we can estimate that close to 68.2 or 68.3 percent of the population falls within this range. Also, we can estimate that about 15.9% of the population falls below this range, and about 15.9% of the population falls above it. Perhaps these estimates suit your need.
Whatever your need happens to be, don't fall into the trap of glorifying IQ, a tendency that probably increases as IQ's themselves increase. They are very useful over a limited range of applications, and beyond that hard work needs to kick in. No one should feel entitled because of an artificial estimate of 'intelligence'. As the saying goes, "IQ is what IQ instruments measure", whatever that means. IQ's do not and should not define anyone.
Brief note on the average and standard deviation: The numbers 100 and 15 are completely arbitrary but generally accepted. You could choose, if you want, 917 as average with a standard deviation of 71, or any other numbers. These numbers are then treated mathematically so that they allow the same valid analysis of the population used in developing the instrument. Virtually the same individuals represented in the 85 to 115 IQ above would be the ones represented by the measures 846 to 988 in our whimsical scenario.
It is difficult to accurately estimate the number of people in the world with low IQ, as IQ assessments can vary and are influenced by factors like culture and socioeconomic status. However, some studies suggest that around 15% of the global population may fall into the category of low IQ.
IQ scores can vary widely among individuals with dyslexia, just as they do within the general population. Dyslexia does not affect intelligence, and many individuals with dyslexia have average or above-average IQ scores. It is important to remember that IQ is just one measure of cognitive abilities and does not fully capture a person's intellectual strengths or abilities.
yes sure
No, the frog leap IQ test is not specifically from China. It is a type of reasoning puzzle that has been used in various settings around the world to test cognitive abilities such as problem-solving and spatial awareness.
Having a high IQ can be an advantage in academic settings or problem-solving scenarios.
No, having an IQ of 84 does not mean you are dumb. IQ is just one measure of intelligence and does not reflect a person's overall abilities or worth. It's important to remember that intelligence comes in many forms and everyone has their own strengths and weaknesses.
That would pretty much depend on which percentage of people is higher...High IQ or Low IQ. If the largest percentage of the population was Low IQ for example than they would continue to produce a large number of Low IQ children and those children would then chose equally Low IQ mates the IQ of general society would be low. If the largest percentage of people was High IQ then again the number of High IQ people would continue to rise. High or low eventually society would even out to a fairly consistant IQ level through out the population. If this IQ level is high society may become more advanced and progress. If this IQ level is low then society may fall behind and not progress well.
a low IQ is when somebody with a low IQ is not so smart if u have a high IQ it means u r smart
Yes
25% of people have an IQ under 100.
Low IQ means that you are under averagely smart!
Low IQ, or some mental disturbance.
No you will have the median of the two. There are special needs parents who have children with normal IQ.
IQ of '40' is very low, to the point of imbecility.
No. 121 is a high IQ. Many actors have very high IQs
The IQ of a bee is reasonably low, compared to a human, but it is higher because it is smart enough to know when they are in danger.
I am disappointed at how low the general IQ is also
Not only is it possible, but many people have the same IQ.