The North had 11 principle manufacturing sities, while the South had only 2. The huge copper, iron, and coal deposits in the North provided abudant resources for manufacturing, while the more extensive railroad system helped ditribute resources and products.
5
both cities in the north and south offered freedmen freedom
...it was the North that developed industrial manufacturing.
actually students or fellow classmates out there the north won the war since they had more money from manufacturing and other goods than the south
The North was trying to protect its manufacturing industry from cheap imports. The South had very little industry, and wanted cheap imports.
Four things the north has that the south doesn't are: Ohio, New York, Montana, Illinois.
North's is 11, South's with only 2.
The south lagged behind the North in manufacturing because of the Civil War.
Because the North was into manufacturing instead of agriculture as the south was.
both cities in the north and south offered freedmen freedom
the major economical difference between the north and the south is the north was based on manufacturing while south was agriculutural
because the south was more agriculturally focused, where as the north was driven by manufacturing.
The South was very agricultural whereas the North was not. The North's economy was based on manufacturing and the South had plantations where crops were grown.
the major economical difference between the north and the south is the north was based on manufacturing while south was agriculutural
There was a large manufacturing base in the North. In the South, it's the industry is mostly agriculture.
During the US Civil War, the North had more supplies than the South because of the North's better developed manufacturing base. Also, because most of the North's manufacturing and farmlands were out of reach by the South, manufacturing in the North was able to produce the products necessary to have a better supply of goods.
...it was the North that developed industrial manufacturing.
The south's economy shifted from ariculture to manufacturing