The North was trying to protect its manufacturing industry from cheap imports.
The South had very little industry, and wanted cheap imports.
There is NO North Vietnam & South Vietnam today (and there hasn't been a north & south for over 30 years; when the north conquered the south, ending the war in 1975). Today's Communist Vietnam is President Triet.
It started on the south side but when they meet, they cross over toward the north side.
after North Vietnamese troops took over Saigon in 1975.
North Korea is the only country that has a land border with South Korea. However, South Korea is not that far from China and Japan over the water.
The over-dependence of the South on its cotton exports. It had no manufacturing base, and had to import everything it needed. The North was trying to protect its own manufacturing industry by raising tariffs on imports. This looked like a tax on the South. So the South needed more slave-states, to increase its representation in congress. That is why there was so much controversy about the terms of admission of new territories into the USA.
Economic condition following the panic of 1837
to help factories
As the South found it increasingly hard to get new territories admitted to the Union as slave-states, they were increasingly outvoted in Congress. This enabled the industrialised North to protect its manufacturing sector by raising tariffs on imports. The South, having almost no manufacturing industry, needed imports much more than the North did. So the tariffs looked embarrassingly like the North directly taxing the South. That is why South Carolina refused the pay the tariffs, claiming States' Rights - the right of one state to over-rule Federal law.
Southerners thought the federal government was benefiting one region over another
the imiposition of higher tariffs
In the North, political divisions existed over issues such as tariffs, internal improvements, and the role of the federal government in regulating the economy. In the South, divisions centered on states' rights, slavery, and the extent of federal power over states' decisions. These divisions ultimately contributed to the growing tensions between the North and South leading up to the Civil War.
When President Andrew Jackson allowed tariffs for manufacturing trade in the North, the South opposed the new taxes because it increased the price of imported goods. The tariffs caused financial problems in the South. American goods could be sold cheaper than British goods. The people in the North could make a good profit and people from other countries chose more American goods which made American trade stronger. On the other hand since the south's economy was based on agriculture they had to pay extra for manufactured products from the North. It wasn't fair to the south when the North was gaining money and that they were suffering from the tariffs.
the imiposition of higher tariffs
The industrial north and the less populated agrarian south fought over states's rights issues, tariffs, and lopsided northern representation in Congress. Slavery was a very minor issue at the time.
The north pole is over water and the south pole is over land.
During President Jackson's period of office the "Nullification Crisis", or "secession crisis," of 1828 - 1832, merged issues of sectional strife with disagreements over tariffs. Critics alleged that high tariffs (the "Tariff of Abominations") on imports of common manufactured goods made in Europe made those goods more expensive than ones from the northern U.S., raising the prices paid by planters in the South. Southern politicians argued that tariffs benefited northern industrialists at the expense of southern farmers."
The issue that the North and South fought over was called the Wilmot Proviso. It was basically a law of slavery: the North and South were fighting over slavery. The North were anti-slavery and the South were pro-slavery