There were many sub species of T rex such as the bronchi, the scroter, and the ankli. But the main T rex which dominated the Jurrasic period and all of East Africa, Central Europe and Southern South America was the astounding Tyranni Rexamo
What might be a more interesting question is why is it we find just fossils of the T-Rex? Why don't we find the fossil specimen T-Rex minus 500,000 years? If evolution has occured, shouldn't we find evidence (fossils) indicating clear transitional animals ? Seemingly, the fossil found is always identified as "T-Rex." T-Rex should be but a tiny portion of the fossil findings that leads us up to the T-Rex. Further, shouldn't there be clear physical evidence that the animals of our time are also evolving into something completely different? Shouldn"t we see physical elements that are "incomplete" or still in the transitional phase of it's journey to becoming a different species? Question the theory of evoluition.
on a scale of 1-10 t rex fossils are a 6(medium rare) ;-)
About eight.
two(2)
Trex
Capitalize trex when you are using it as a proper noun, such as a specific thing or trademark.
about 60-70 teeth
Yes
trex
is trex decking safe for dogs?
Trex was 40ft long, but it is not the biggest meat eating dionsaur
No, TRex was Trianosaurus Rex, an extinct (fossil) dinosaur.
About 800 per six
yes they did eat them after mating
Trex because it would step on the sandwich without even noticing.