answersLogoWhite

0

How much did it cost to by a slaves?

Updated: 4/30/2024
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Best Answer

It varied with gender, age, size and health. In 1778 a young (17-30) healthy, average sized male cost $100, century later it was about $150- $175

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

The cost to buy a slave varied depending on factors like age, gender, skill level, and location. In the 19th century in the United States, the average price for a slave was around $800 to $1,200, but prices could range from a few hundred dollars to several thousand dollars for slaves with specialized skills.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How much did it cost to by a slaves?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

How much did slaves get paid?

They were slaves, they worked for food and shelter, not money. They would never get paid the white man took them from their country so the slaves could work for free on the white man's land and farms.


Why did the spanish landowners want to keep slaves?

The slaves mad them rich, and they also had made them feel powerful.


How much were slaves sold for?

The price of slaves varied depending on factors like age, health, skills, and market conditions. On average, slaves in the 19th century were sold for anywhere from a few hundred to several thousand dollars. The prices also varied based on the region and time period in which the transactions took place.


What is the effect of harsh treatment of the slaves?

Harsh treatment of slaves can lead to physical and psychological harm, perpetuate cycles of trauma and abuse, and damage the relationships within the community. It can also result in reduced productivity, increased likelihood of resistance or rebellion, and long-lasting intergenerational effects on the descendants of slaves.


Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indetured servants?

A landowner may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a long-term and potentially more cost-effective labor source compared to indentured servants who were only bound for a fixed period. Slaves were also seen as having less legal rights and were less likely to challenge their owners, giving landowners more control over their workforce.