Want this question answered?
Voluntary intoxication or drug use is almost never the basis for the successful assertion of the insanity defense. However, in most states the defendant's intoxication or drug use may serve as the basis for a claim for diminished capacity.
Yes. Answer: Yes you CAN but you may not. Certain circumstances sometimes allow for not serving anytime. If you defend your home against an armed intruder and kill them, you may be charged with the crime of involuntary manslaughter BUT probably would not serve anytime because your actions were not based on malice AND defense of ones home and family are protected under the US Constitution. without malice means that you did not intentionally set out to murder someone in a premeditated way. Self Defense is a very strong defense against murder or manslaughter charges.
This is current up to 2004Murder and ManslaughterOffenders who have been sentenced to prison for murder or manslaughter will serve an average of 19.1 years in prison under the minimum 85% of sentence served policy compared to 13.1 years under the old parole system and 12.2 years when early prison release existed (chart 8).Murder and manslaughter offenders sentenced to prison in FY2003-2004 will serve an average of 20.5 years, compared to 12.2 years in FY1980-1981 and 9.8 years in FY1987-1988 (chart 9).Offenders convicted today of Second Degree Murder will serve more time in prison today, 21.6 years. They will serve significantly more time than the low of 6.5 years in FY1986-1987 (chart 11).Chart 8Murder/ManslaughterAverage Prison Time Served in Years for New AdmissionsUnder Different Sentencing Policies: FY 1979-80 to FY 2003-2004
Intoxication manslaughter is a subcategory of manslaughter meaning that the killing was no premeditated but occurred while the offender was so under the influence of alcohol that mens rea could not apply
The driver was charged with manslaughter after hitting a pedestrian while under the influence of alcohol.
The court will accept that the sheriff made a reasonable attempt to serve the defendant debtor. That being the case the lawsuit will go forward as it is presumed under the law that the defendant has been legally served regardless of the non acceptance/signing of the summons.
that is called coercion, or if the facts allow, you could also say the crime was committed under duress
Every story has two sides and under the laws of the US (and many other nations) the presumption of innocence always lies with the accused/defendant until the government is capable of disproving their defense beyond a reasonable doubt.
No, that is why it is called a MANDATORY minimum sentence.
The insanity defense is used by criminal defendants. The most common variation is cognitive insanity. Under the test for cognitive insanity, a defendant must have been so impaired by a mental disease or defect at the time of the act that he or she did not know the nature or quality of the act, or, if the defendant did know the nature or quality of the act, he or she did not know that the act was wrong. The vast majority of states allow criminal defendants to invoke the cognitive insanity defense. In Bundy's case, the defense didn't do much. He took the death penalty.
No, the defendant is not required to provide testimony in their trial. The right to remain silent is protected under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and a defendant cannot be compelled to testify against themselves.
Counterclaim under FRCP 13.