There is no blanket answer to this question. Whether the defendant testifies on their own behalf, is a legal strategy that the defense attorney will discuss with his client when the time comes.
When citing testimony in a speech, the speaker should always attribute the source of the information and ensure it is credible. It is important to clearly state who provided the testimony and their qualifications to establish the legitimacy of the information. Additionally, it is good practice to provide context or background information about the source to give the audience a better understanding of the testimony's relevance.
As with all offenses, you must have some CREDIBLE evidence that the harassment is taking place. Video, audio, eyewitnesses, etc. Criminal charges are not brought simply on unsubstantiated claims.
It depends on the specific requirements of the location or activity. In some cases, children under 18 may not need to provide ID if accompanied by an adult who can verify their identity. However, it is always a good idea to carry identification for minors when traveling or participating in activities.
In medieval times, royal courts were often influenced by political agendas, resulting in biased verdicts. Additionally, court proceedings were not always transparent, and the accused might not have had access to a proper defense. The use of torture and the absence of legal counsel further suggest that fair trials were not always guaranteed.
Those who are required to wear a PFD or Personal Flotation Device by law depends on where you are, and is dependent on what type of water craft you are using. Typically anyone using a PWC or Personal Water Craft (i.e. Jet Ski, Canoe, Kayak etc.) is required to where a PFD. For larger water craft typically anyone under the age of 16 required/recommended, however you are always required to have enough PFDs for anybody on-board the water craft at all times, failure to do so could get you slammed with hefty fines.
When citing testimony in a speech, the speaker should always attribute the source of the information and ensure it is credible. It is important to clearly state who provided the testimony and their qualifications to establish the legitimacy of the information. Additionally, it is good practice to provide context or background information about the source to give the audience a better understanding of the testimony's relevance.
Yes, in a criminal trial it is always the government against the defendant.
The defendant in a criminal case is not required to prove innocence. The prosecution is required to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The plaintiff/prosecutor speaks first, usually summarizing the evidence that has been presented, and highlighting items most beneficial to the prosecution. The attorney for the defendant speaks next.
Everyone has the right to a fair trial. The prosecution has access to information, considering they are always in close contact with the police. The prosecutor's job is not only to prosecute the defendant, but to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial in the court of law. Allowing the defense access to this information gives them the ability to provide an adequate defense to the charges being brought against them.
References are not always required, but they can be helpful to support your arguments, provide evidence for your claims, and give credibility to your work. The decision to include references depends on the context and requirements of the task at hand.
A spouse or civil partner of a defendant is almost always considered a competent witness for either side, and may choose to testify for or against their spouse. A defendant may, when relevant, compel their spouse or civil partner to testify on their behalf. The prosecution however, may only compel the testimony of the defendant's spouse or civil partner in cases of domestic abuse or violence or sexual offences towards persons under 16. When the spouse or civil partner is a co-defendant to the charges, they may not be compelled to testify. ~wikipedia.org/wiki/Spousal_privilege
Yes, in the US justice system the defendant always must be told what he or she is charged with.
The plaintiff wins the case by default and a judgment is entered against the defendant. A civil lawsuit summons is not a court order per se and therefore the defendant is not obligated to appear. An order of appearance from the court, interrogatories, depositions, discovery motions and so forth are different matters and the person(s) named should always respond. Legal counsel is always advisable in such matters.
Sometimes, but not necessarily always.
Benvolio's testimony may not be fully accurate as he could have missed or misinterpreted details. He could also have biases or partial views on the events. It is always important to consider multiple perspectives when evaluating the accuracy of testimony.
To overcome inertia, a force is always required.
There is no such amendment. The principles of justice and law in the US is that the defendant is ALWAYS innocent until PROVEN guilty. Therefore the defendant ALWAYS has the presumption of innocence on his side and the prosecution bears the burden to prove you guilty.