answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Creationists teach that the world was created roughly 6000 years ago [4004BC (Bishop Ussher's date of creation) + 2008 yrs 6012 years ago] as of this date in 2008.

ANSWER

The simplistic answer to this question is that the earth was created in 4004BC and since it's 2015 now it is 6018 years old [note: no year zero between 1BC and 1AD] meaning that the earth and everything on it and the whole entire universe is roughly 6000 years old.

However, it's more complicated than that!

The relevant verses quoted are:-

Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.-

Genesis 1 :2 Now the earth was without shape and empty.......

However, these verses are actually English translations of the Hebrew words

There was more than one creation: there were actually two.:-

The FIRST was when God created the entire universe (including earth) for Lucifer and the angels some time in the past.

[ Lucifer was put in charge of all this. The universe was created to be run by and suitable for angels. However, Lucifer rebelled, his name was changed to Satan and the angels who followed him became demons, and the entire universe (including earth) was wrecked and rendered barren in judgement.]

The SECOND was when God then started all over again and re-created the earth so it was suitable for Man and to be ruled by Man {Adam}.

[ Satan didn't want to give up his realm so made Adam surrender it by causing him to sin, and then Jesus Christ - the second Adam - took it back again, but that's a different story!].

In summary

The earth was re-created 6000 years ago, but it was originally created long before then.

That is why there are two different times for the ages of the earth and the universe: scientists have calculated that while the universe is 13.8 Billion years old the Earth is only 4.6 Billion.

All Creation Scientists, whether YEC or OEC accept these dates to one degree or the other.

For explanatory details and verification of the above, see:-

(1) The first relevant verse and translation notes in NET Bible:-:-

Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

The English word "created" is a translation of the Hebrew word 'bara' and really means the universe and earth was not created out of nothing in 4004BC but rather was re-created in 4004BC.

For verification see NET Bible reference notes on Genesis 1:1:-

The English verb "create" captures well the meaning of the Hebrew term in this context. The verb (bara') always describes the divine activity of fashioning something new, fresh, and perfect. The verb does not necessarily describe creation out of nothing... it often stresses forming anew, reforming, renewing

(2) The second relevant verse and translation notes in NET Bible:-:-

Genesis 1 :2 Now the earth was without shape and empty.......

For verification see NET Bible reference notes on Genesis 1:2:-

Some translate 1:2a "and the earth became," arguing that v. 1 describes the original creation of the earth, while v. 2 refers to a judgment that reduced it to a chaotic condition. Verses 3ff. then describe the re-creation of the earth. ...... The words describe a condition that is without form and empty. What we now know as "the earth" was actually an unfilled mass covered by water and darkness.

(3) Also See the very detailed and unbiased article "Is There a Gap Between Genesis One Verse 1 and 2?" by : Arnold Mendez ]

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

'Creation Science' is not a science in the normal sense of the word, so the teachings of Creation Scientists are opinions, not evidence-based. Because Creation Science involves opinion, more than one age is proposed for the earth, but in general terms they can be grouped under two headings - 'Young-earth creationism' and 'Old-earth creationism'. The difference is that Old-earth creationists accept the scientific evidence that the earth is billions of years old, although they may refuse to accept other scientific facts. Young-earth creationists, on the other hand, insist that the earth was created in the very recent past and is only a few thousand years old. Based on Bishop Ussher's biblical analysis, many go as far as to say that the world was created in 4004 BCE, just over 6000 years ago, but others consider it to be up to around 10,000 years old..

For more information on creation science and its biblical origins, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How old is the world according to Creation Scientists?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Did God create the world in seven days according to the Islamic creation story?

AnswerThe Quran does not contain a creation account in the same way as the Christian Old Testament does. However, it refers to the Old Testament creation stories, and Islam accepts the Judaic explanation of creation in seven days.


How old is the iceman?

The Iceman, Is About 5,300 years old according to what the scientists know and what they have figured out.


How many billion of years old is the universe according to scientists?

14 billion


How do scientists know how old the world is?

I don't know, but scientist know.


How old can a coelacanth live?

Scientists estimate their life span to be about 60 years.


How much time was the world created in and how old is it?

No one knows how much time it took to create the world and even scientists can not be 100% sure how old it is.


What year was the world born?

"Ussher deduced that the first day of creation began at nightfall on Saturday, October 22, 4004 BC, in the proleptic Julian calendar, near the autumnal equinox." (Wikipedia). HOWEVER, scientists ESTIMATE that Earth is 4.543 billion years old.


How old are the pillars of creation?

The idea of the "pillars of creation" are as old as God. The actual implementation is not.


Example of myth in the Old Testament?

One example of myth in the Old Testament is the story of the creation of the world in the book of Genesis. This account explains the origins of the universe and humanity through a symbolic narrative involving the creation of the world in six days by God.


Why do some scientists say the creation story is made up?

Scientists who contend that the biblical story of creation is false are following the philosophy of naturalism which specifically excludes creation as something which can be considered. This is rather interesting in the light of modern science which developed in an era where people believed in God and so also believed in as a consequence an orderly universe which could be understood and studied. In more recent times some scientists have sought to use the unscientific philosophy of naturalism which explicitly excludes the creator, when science cannot disprove God by any endeavor deemed to be scientific. Other scientists, although certainly in a minority, do not find any conflict whatsoever between the facts of science and creation. These scientists do not regard the creation story as made up. This demonstrates it is a philosophical position which causes people to regard the creatin story as made up. It is also a philosophical statement, not a scientific one to regard certain things as facts which are not at ll proven but which are open to question and debate such as the age of the earth. It is explicitly the alleged age of the earth, which in recent times has had much contrary evidence brought against it, which is open to question by such data but which is used to call into the question the view that the earth was created by God around 6000 years ago.


What do scientists say about creation?

The vast majority of scientists say that creation, as opposed to current biological, physical, chemical and astronomical models, is pseudoscience with a religious and political agenda.When we say "majority", we don't just mean 101 to 100. We're talking 999 out of every 1000. Some creation supporters have compiled lists of a few hundred "scientists" which support it. Most of these "scientists" are unqualified; most of the remainder have very little actual qualification. Of the few others, their opinion is based on religious (and not purely scientific) grounds.There are hundreds of thousands of scientists who would attest that their work and research indicates current science to be correct, and creationist claims to the contrary are unfounded, based in misapplication, misunderstanding, and speculation about facts.Quite simply, scientists (as a group) say that creationism is wrong/false/incorrect/fake.ANSWERYou will find that anti-creation scientists are over-represented in the field of Biology despite overwhelming modern evidence and research otherwise by other scientists in other fields such as ENTROPY. [Not old parroted "facts" and opinions passed off as facts but since discredited].Anyway, most scientists couldn't care less - it's just the squeaking wheel that gets the most grease.


Where did Pluto come from?

Pluto is at least 1 million years old according to scientists