The vast majority of scientists say that creation, as opposed to current biological, physical, chemical and astronomical models, is pseudoscience with a religious and political agenda.
When we say "majority", we don't just mean 101 to 100. We're talking 999 out of every 1000. Some creation supporters have compiled lists of a few hundred "scientists" which support it. Most of these "scientists" are unqualified; most of the remainder have very little actual qualification. Of the few others, their opinion is based on religious (and not purely scientific) grounds.
There are hundreds of thousands of scientists who would attest that their work and research indicates current science to be correct, and creationist claims to the contrary are unfounded, based in misapplication, misunderstanding, and speculation about facts.
Quite simply, scientists (as a group) say that creationism is wrong/false/incorrect/fake.
ANSWER
You will find that anti-creation scientists are over-represented in the field of Biology despite overwhelming modern evidence and research otherwise by other scientists in other fields such as ENTROPY. [Not old parroted "facts" and opinions passed off as facts but since discredited].
Anyway, most scientists couldn't care less - it's just the squeaking wheel that gets the most grease.
Scientists who contend that the biblical story of creation is false are following the philosophy of naturalism which specifically excludes creation as something which can be considered. This is rather interesting in the light of modern science which developed in an era where people believed in God and so also believed in as a consequence an orderly universe which could be understood and studied. In more recent times some scientists have sought to use the unscientific philosophy of naturalism which explicitly excludes the creator, when science cannot disprove God by any endeavor deemed to be scientific. Other scientists, although certainly in a minority, do not find any conflict whatsoever between the facts of science and creation. These scientists do not regard the creation story as made up. This demonstrates it is a philosophical position which causes people to regard the creatin story as made up. It is also a philosophical statement, not a scientific one to regard certain things as facts which are not at ll proven but which are open to question and debate such as the age of the earth. It is explicitly the alleged age of the earth, which in recent times has had much contrary evidence brought against it, which is open to question by such data but which is used to call into the question the view that the earth was created by God around 6000 years ago.
Scientists say that Uranus is a 'tipped over' because it may have been tipped over by a collision with a massive object.
nope, scientists say that it might blow up in 5000000000 years
Scientists believe they can trace all the matter in the universe to its creation in the 'big bang' which happened around 13.7 billion years ago. This produced mainly hydrogen and helium and the heavier elements have been made in the cores of stars which have exploded since that time.
Her creation intrigued the group.
Creation Today - 2011 Do Creation Scientists Have the Answers 3-5 was released on: USA: 9 August 2013
What you say is highly speculative. There are indeed scientists that consider this kind of possibilities, but this is not something that is generally accepted by mainstream scientists.What you say is highly speculative. There are indeed scientists that consider this kind of possibilities, but this is not something that is generally accepted by mainstream scientists.What you say is highly speculative. There are indeed scientists that consider this kind of possibilities, but this is not something that is generally accepted by mainstream scientists.What you say is highly speculative. There are indeed scientists that consider this kind of possibilities, but this is not something that is generally accepted by mainstream scientists.
christian scientists views on creation are that god made everything in 7 days and rested on the last day.
Most scientists do not believe in Biblical Creation, so there is no reason to tie it with the extinction of dinosaurs. However, Creationists often say that humans originally co-existed alongside dinosaurs until the Great Flood, when dinosaurs all drowned.
scientists believe or accordng to scientists
Scientists.
There are scientists that believe in a god and there are scientists that don't. Surveys find that a large majority of scientists do not believe in a god and even fewer believe in a creation account of the world.
If you think about it, it sort of is. But what scientists can't replicate is the creation of the original DNA. What scientists do is twist god's creation by taking the DNA of another creature, sticking that DNA in an egg cell, and place the egg cell in the original DNA doner.
Scientists have not developed any theories about God's creation. They investigate the natural world and its origins, but have found no evidence that would require involvement of God (or gods) in the origin of the world.
God saw the creation and said that it was good.
Stanley Miller and Harold Urey
Skapelse