0
How tanks finally broke the stalemate of trench warfare in ww1?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Before the invention of the tank, no mans land was often impossible to advance through. Machine guns were fired constantly. The men couldn't advance through without getting slaughtered. In battles like the Somme in July 1916, this was greatly apparent. But finally, the armoured tank came into battle. It could advance across the land without getting destroyed/damaged by machine gun fire, and made the idea of trench warfare obsolete. Now, the pace of World War One was finally moving again, at battles like Cambrai in November 1917. By 1918, the first tank-on-tank battles had taken place. The tank would be a part of warfare that would stay, and define the fast movement and 'Blitzkrieg" of World War Two
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was so much of World War 1 dominated by trench warfare?
World War I was dominated by trench warfare for one reason: it was effective in stopping the enemy's attacks. That is to say, defensive technology and tactics were, during this conflict, far more effective than offensive technology and tactics. It would not be until World War II that offensive developments broke through the trench-warfare deadlock.
Why the tanks broke the stalemate?
Tanks are huge killing machines. They had not been seen/used before WW1 and were both deadly and psychologically terrifying.
How did trench warfare destroy the image of war as a heroic undertaking?
One of the features of World War I was the way the conflict on the Western Front quickly developed into brutal trench warfare, with neither side able to advance its position, gaining only a few feet at a tremendous loss of life. Arranged in a zigzag pattern, these rudimentary trenches were designed so that enemy troops couldn't fire straight down the ditch if they broke through the opposing army's defenses. By war's end, the trenches had morphed into elaborate passageways where soldiers ate, slept and lived, before, of course, many of them died. Aside from the deadly nature of this warfare, soldiers also suffered through the weather conditions on the front. Heavy rainfall would flood the trenches and create such extreme muddy conditions that drowning was a constant threat. The soggy conditions often resulted in "trench foot," which when untreated led to gangrene. The threat of disease was ever-present as rats, flies and lice bred in huge numbers. The sheer futility of this type combat prompted a round of deadly innovation-the first use of poison gas and the widespread use of the barbed-wire fence. The fencing created a contested territory, or "No Man's Land," between the two enemy trench systems in which neither side could move openly. And it was another innovation: the Allies' tank, which gained widespread use in the final year of the war that eventually broke the stalemate in the trenches.
Did technology help to break the stalemate on the western front?
in my opinion, what really broke the stalemate was when the US joined. fresh new troops for the Allies gave them an advantage over the tired Central Powers.
What effects did tanks have during World War 1?
AnswerWell, in WWI, tanks gave militaries the advantage, of course, but they were clumsy in the beginning, and their drivers were not the best trained, since everyone was inexperienced with them.
What new weapon finally broke the stalemate by negating the defensive advantage of entrenched troops?
The tank.
Why was so much of World War 1 dominated by trench warfare?
World War I was dominated by trench warfare for one reason: it was effective in stopping the enemy's attacks. That is to say, defensive technology and tactics were, during this conflict, far more effective than offensive technology and tactics. It would not be until World War II that offensive developments broke through the trench-warfare deadlock.
How was the stalemate on the Western front finally broken?
The United States entered World War 1. After much fighting the United States Army broke through German lines and German resistance collapsed.
What proposal broke the stalemate over representation by suggesting a congress composed of house of representatives and a senate?
The Connecticut Compromise
What proposal broke the stalemate over representation by suggesting a congress composed of a house of representatives a Senate?
The Connecticut Compromise
What proposal broke the stalemate over representative by suggesting a congress composed of a House of Representatives and a senate?
The Connecticut Compromise
What proposal broke the stalemate over representation by suggestion a congress composed of a house of representatives and a senate?
The Connecticut Compromise
Why the tanks broke the stalemate?
Tanks are huge killing machines. They had not been seen/used before WW1 and were both deadly and psychologically terrifying.
What is an example sentence using the word for finally?
finally i reached the place. I broke up with him Finally.
What proposal broke the stalemate over representation by suggesting a congress composed of a House of REpresentatives and Senate?
The Connecticut Compromise
How did trench warfare destroy the image of war as a heroic undertaking?
One of the features of World War I was the way the conflict on the Western Front quickly developed into brutal trench warfare, with neither side able to advance its position, gaining only a few feet at a tremendous loss of life. Arranged in a zigzag pattern, these rudimentary trenches were designed so that enemy troops couldn't fire straight down the ditch if they broke through the opposing army's defenses. By war's end, the trenches had morphed into elaborate passageways where soldiers ate, slept and lived, before, of course, many of them died. Aside from the deadly nature of this warfare, soldiers also suffered through the weather conditions on the front. Heavy rainfall would flood the trenches and create such extreme muddy conditions that drowning was a constant threat. The soggy conditions often resulted in "trench foot," which when untreated led to gangrene. The threat of disease was ever-present as rats, flies and lice bred in huge numbers. The sheer futility of this type combat prompted a round of deadly innovation-the first use of poison gas and the widespread use of the barbed-wire fence. The fencing created a contested territory, or "No Man's Land," between the two enemy trench systems in which neither side could move openly. And it was another innovation: the Allies' tank, which gained widespread use in the final year of the war that eventually broke the stalemate in the trenches.
Did technology help to break the stalemate on the western front?
in my opinion, what really broke the stalemate was when the US joined. fresh new troops for the Allies gave them an advantage over the tired Central Powers.
