William I and Harold II fought in the Battle of Hastings.
No it is actually october 14 of October 1066 where William of normandy won the battle
the fought
There were no Romans in the Battle of Hastings. They had long since faded into history. This decisive battle in 1066 won by the Normans. It was fought between the Norman, William the Conqueror and an Anglo-Saxon army led by Harold Godwinson.
It was the battle of Hastings in 1066 and it made him king.
William I and Harold II fought in the Battle of Hastings.
No it is actually october 14 of October 1066 where William of normandy won the battle
the fought
because it was fought in a place called sussex but they thought they were fighting in Hastings.
The Normans won the battle of Hastings because less than 3 weeks before England fought in another battle against the Vikings, but remember they didn't have vehicles but only there legs so after that battle England had to walk from the North to the South of the country so England were very warn out when it came to the battle of Hastings. So that's properly the reason why the Normans won the battle of Hastings!
Battle of hastings.
There were no Romans in the Battle of Hastings. They had long since faded into history. This decisive battle in 1066 won by the Normans. It was fought between the Norman, William the Conqueror and an Anglo-Saxon army led by Harold Godwinson.
William would have been about 38-39 when he fought in the battle of Hastings.
It was the battle of Hastings in 1066 and it made him king.
Will (iam) won the battle of Hastings against Harold godwinson
It took place when William the Conqueror and Harold Godwinson fought over the throne of Edward the Confessor after he died without leaving an heir to the throne. William the Conqueror won the battle and became the new King of England
William duke of Normandy fought Harold Godwinson in the battle of Hastings, which was fought at Senlac Hill.