answersLogoWhite

0

Both sides were equally uneasy about it, but this managed to hold the balance for about thirty years, until the future of California came to be decided.

If there had been two states of North and South California, then war could probably have been avoided. But the vast new state extended too far on either side of the Missouri line for the Compromise to be practical, and a new Compromise had to be worked out. This one did not last.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the northern view of the compromise of Missouri?

The Northern states were opposed to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. They felt Missouri should not be a slave state as it would give the South more power.


How can you make a sentence with Missouri Compromise?

The Missouri Compromise was done in 1820. The Missouri Compromise decided North and South Power.


Was Missouri compromise in the north or south?

south


How was the balance of power between the north and south preserved?

the Missouri compromise


Which statement is trueThe Missouri Compromise postponed the issue of slavery?

The Missouri Compromise postponed the issue of slavery.


What attempts did north and the south make to compromise?

They made the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850.


Allowed Slavery south of latitude 36 30'?

Missouri Compromise


What groups split between The Missouri Compromise?

The Missouri Compromise splits the early America into the South (where slavery is upheld) and the North ( Where slavery is banned)


What did the Missouri Compromise help resolve?

The Missouri Compromise helped resolve the voting balance between the south and the north.So Missouri was admitted as a slave and Maine was admitted as a free state.


What did the north and south gain and give up in the Missouri Compromise?

The Missouri Compromise provided that no Slave State could be established to the north of a line represented by the parallel 36° 30' coincident with the Southern boundary of Missouri.


Was the Missouri Compromise of 1850 more favorable for the North or the South?

Basically the Missouri Compromise of 1850 was a fair compromise. One problem for Northern abolitionists was that the Compromise ushered in the Fugitive Slave Act. They were outraged that the new compromise included this law.


Did the Missouri Compromise cause much division between North and the South?

no