William was better prepared for the Battle of Hastings compared to others. However, none of the groups prepared effectively for the ensuing battle.
are you from ms gardezi's class?
he was quite well prepared for the battle as he had many plans, many men and almost the same number horses.
A better question is "When wasn't William Penn intoxicated?"
The Normans should have won the battle of Hastings because they had a better army and they were more prepared for war. Also, William the Conqurer had more reasons to become king then the other monarchs. In the end, it was they who won the battle.
William was better prepared for the Battle of Hastings compared to others. However, none of the groups prepared effectively for the ensuing battle.
because he was more prepared and would have been a better leader in the future.
If he was not well prepared, he wouldn't have taken over England, now, would he?
It all depends on how well prepared he/she is
thats wrong because william was prepared with his horses and weopens
yes of course he was!
William was a good king because he was well prepared and was a good leader.
if they new about so they could be more prepared
Prepared enough to go into ROTC or the REAL military.
I believe it was 1st Baron Petre ( William Petre ( 1500-1572 )--although I am prepared to be contradicted.
William was very well prepared which made him a good leader, he did the very clever trick of retreating down the hill!
William won the battle of Hastings so he could be regarded as 'better'.