The Boston Massacre was not really a massacre, but more like a riot. In fact only five people died. One of the most common myths is that the BM was the event that led to the Revolutionary War. In fact, many important events led up to the massacre. It was called a massacre by the use of Propaganda. It mainly started by the British trying to enforce laws. British Soldiers were sent to America to enforce the Proclamation and to maintain order but their presence just made matter worse. It all started March 5 by a couple of boys throwing snowballs at British soldiers. A crowd soon gathered throwing ice and making fun of them. Soon after, the British started firing wildly. Other weapons were clubs, knives, swords, and a popular weapon, your own bare hands.
The Boston Massacre did happen but when Patriot printers put the story in their newspapers they greatly exaggerated it, as to raise anger against the British.
Paul Revers's painting made it seem like the colonists were completely innocent when in reality, they had been intimidating and harming the soldiers. Also, the fact that it was even called a massacre was Propaganda since it was just a horrible misfortune.
Paul Revere, but the illustration is inaccurate. It was used as propaganda during the times of the Boston Massacre.
The famous engraving of the the Boston Massacre was etched by Paul Revere.
Paul Revere made an engraving of the Boston Massacre which was used as propaganda against the British.
Paul Revere made an engraving of the Boston Massacre, portraying it as an unprovoked attack on civilians by British soldiers. It was sued on a flier about the Boston Massacre that was widely distributed throughout the colonies This was pure propaganda and was used to incite discontent and distrust between the colonists and the British troops.
colonial leaders used news of the killings against the british
Propaganda
Boston massacre
yes
propaganda
Colonial leaders used news of the killings as Propaganda-information designed to influence opinion-against the British.
Yes, you can make a video on any subject without sound, but to make a convincing video about whether or not the Boston Massacre was a massacre or propaganda would take a lot of research into the Boston Massacre that supports your thesis about which it was. Also, you might consider adding sound, since it would make the video much more interesting than writing words on the video that people would have to read.
Paul Revere made and sold copies of Henry Pelham'sengravings of the Boston Massacre. Another engraver, Jonathan Mulliken, also made and sold prints of the event