The Inca empire was vastly different than the Roman Empire as the Incas were more primitive than the Romans. There were differences in technology, transportation, and farming. The terrain of the two empires was vastly different. The Romans had a multitude of landscapes while the Incas were mostly mountain people. The horse was unknown to the Incas.
The Inca empire was vastly different than the Roman empire as the Incas were more primitive than the Romans. There were differences in technology, transportation, and farming. The terrain of the two empires was vastly different. The Romans had a multitude of landscapes while the Incas were mostly mountain people. The horse was unknown to the Incas.
The Inca empire was vastly different than the Roman empire as the Incas were more primitive than the Romans. There were differences in technology, transportation, and farming. The terrain of the two empires was vastly different. The Romans had a multitude of landscapes while the Incas were mostly mountain people. The horse was unknown to the Incas.
The Inca empire was vastly different than the Roman empire as the Incas were more primitive than the Romans. There were differences in technology, transportation, and farming. The terrain of the two empires was vastly different. The Romans had a multitude of landscapes while the Incas were mostly mountain people. The horse was unknown to the Incas.
The Inca empire was vastly different than the Roman empire as the Incas were more primitive than the Romans. There were differences in technology, transportation, and farming. The terrain of the two empires was vastly different. The Romans had a multitude of landscapes while the Incas were mostly mountain people. The horse was unknown to the Incas.
The Inca empire was vastly different than the Roman empire as the Incas were more primitive than the Romans. There were differences in technology, transportation, and farming. The terrain of the two empires was vastly different. The Romans had a multitude of landscapes while the Incas were mostly mountain people. The horse was unknown to the Incas.
The Inca empire was vastly different than the Roman empire as the Incas were more primitive than the Romans. There were differences in technology, transportation, and farming. The terrain of the two empires was vastly different. The Romans had a multitude of landscapes while the Incas were mostly mountain people. The horse was unknown to the Incas.
The Inca empire was vastly different than the Roman empire as the Incas were more primitive than the Romans. There were differences in technology, transportation, and farming. The terrain of the two empires was vastly different. The Romans had a multitude of landscapes while the Incas were mostly mountain people. The horse was unknown to the Incas.
The Inca empire was vastly different than the Roman empire as the Incas were more primitive than the Romans. There were differences in technology, transportation, and farming. The terrain of the two empires was vastly different. The Romans had a multitude of landscapes while the Incas were mostly mountain people. The horse was unknown to the Incas.
From what we know of the Inca empire, it certainly was not better than the Roman empire. However, the two empires cannot be compared as they have nothing in common except that they were empires. They existed on different continents at different times and had different cultures and degrees of civilization.
The Inca empire was vastly different than the Roman empire as the Incas were more primitive than the Romans. There were differences in technology, transportation, and farming. The terrain of the two empires was vastly different. The Romans had a multitude of landscapes while the Incas were mostly mountain people. The horse was unknown to the Incas.
yes,it was
Because the Romans had better tactics,better army,better equipment than the Celts(British). This means they won lots of battles.
There was no such thing as the Eastern Romans Empire and the Western Romans Empire. These are terms which have been coined by historians. The Romans just said Roman empire and the two geographical areas were called the east and the west.. Both areas had large numbers of troops stationed in the frontier regions. The east came under pressure by the Persian Empire and the west came under pressure by the Germanic peoples.
The Romans had a better organised army with better formations, The Greeks were more learned with better weapons and tactics, and the Egyptians were harsh rulers making the soldirs more afraid of them than the enemy.Romans are better than the egytains and Greeks that's why they conqued them.
First of all, The Aztecs were the only of the three that sacrificed human hearts to their gods, while the Incas were the only civilization of the time to have taught the practice of brain surgery. Although they used brain surgery, they were only successful about 25% of the time, which is still better than no success at all. The Incas also accumulated the largest empire of the three. The Mayans Lasted Longer.
The Incas were.
incas
its because the spanish had better armer than the incas and were better fighters.
The Spanish had superior weaponry such as guns, cannons, and steel swords compared to the Aztecs and Incas who primarily used obsidian weapons. The Spanish also had horses, which the indigenous peoples had never encountered before, giving them a military advantage. Additionally, the Spanish had the assistance of indigenous allies who were enemies of the Aztec and Inca Empires.
The Carthaginians were sea traders and had a fleet of warships to protect it. The Romans were extending their empire by land. The two were allies for a period - a convenient way of combining complimentary strengths.
yes,it was
The Mughal empire is better than the Maratha empire.
yes
First of all, The Aztecs were the only of the three that sacrificed human hearts to their gods, while the Incas were the only civilization of the time to have taught the practice of brain surgery. Although they used brain surgery, they were only successful about 25% of the time, which is still better than no success at all. The Incas also accumulated the largest empire of the three. The Mayans Lasted Longer.
Because the Romans had better tactics,better army,better equipment than the Celts(British). This means they won lots of battles.
The Incas lived in Peru, spreading from what is now Chile to Quito(what is now Equador),nearly as big as the roman empire. Also they're national language was QuechuaKe-chew-ahThe Incas ruled a great empire in South America - but only for a short time. At its peak the Incas Empire lasted less than a century before it was destroyed by the Spaniards.In about 1300 the Incas founded their capital city of Cuzco. They were only a small tribe but they came to rule a vast empire including most of Peru and parts of Chile, Ecuador, Bolivia and northwest Argentina. The expansion began in 1438 under their ruler Pachakuti and continued under his successors.theInca lived in part of south America in between 1200 AD and 1535 AD and in Peru and Chile.
If you don't have solders than who would keep order. so the Romans used to build barrackses to shelter roman legainares from different parts of the empire. If you don't have solders than who would keep order. so the Romans used to build barrackses to shelter roman legainares from different parts of the empire.