0
Morally: Unrestricted submarine warfare by Germany resulted in the deaths of many Americans, including over one hundred U.S. citizens traveling on Lusitania.
Economically: Trade with Great Britain was being negatively affected by German intervention. Entering the war would create a strong U.S. foothold in Europe.
Politically: The Zimmerman Telegram, which suggested that Mexico should wage war against the U.S., provoked America to enter.
What else can I help you with?
Why was there a conflict about slavery?
Slavery was and is morally wrong.
What did abolitionists say about slavery?
·Morally Wrong·cruel And Inhumane ·A Violation Of The Principals Of The Constitution
What view helped push the North and the South apart by 1861?
By 1861, the differing views on slavery significantly contributed to the division between the North and the South. The North largely opposed the expansion of slavery into new territories, viewing it as morally wrong and economically backward. In contrast, the South defended slavery as essential to its agrarian economy and way of life. This fundamental disagreement over slavery's role in society fueled tensions that ultimately led to the Civil War.
Why Abraham Lincoln ruled unconstitutional?
Because he had actual morals and knew that human slavery was morally wrong.
Most influenced the Northern and Southern positions about slavery?
The Northern and Southern positions on slavery were primarily influenced by economic interests, cultural values, and political power. The North, characterized by industrialization and a growing abolitionist movement, viewed slavery as morally wrong and economically inefficient. In contrast, the South's agrarian economy relied heavily on slave labor for crops like cotton and tobacco, leading to a staunch defense of slavery as essential for their way of life. This fundamental disagreement ultimately fueled sectional tensions that contributed to the Civil War.
To what extent was the US morally economically and politically justified in entering the First world war against Germany?
stop
Was the settlement of Germany post WW2 as difficult as the settlement of Iraq is today?
It was very different. Germany had fought a very long and exhausting war. The country was politically, economically and morally bankrupt. There was almost no insurgency.
What did the free-soilers oppose why?
They opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories because 'free men on free soil comprise a morally and economically superior system to slavery'
What morally counts for social contract ethics?
those who are capable of entering into the contract.
Social contract ethics those who count morally are?
those who are capable of entering into the contract
What did the free soilers oppose why?
They opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories because 'free men on free soil comprise a morally and economically superior system to slavery'
What did the Free-Soiler oppose?
They opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories because 'free men on free soil comprise a morally and economically superior system to slavery'
What is the philosophy of education of manuel quezon?
Manuel L. Quezon's Philosophy of Education was Filipino oriented. He wanted colonial people to improve themselves intellectually, morally, and economically.
How did the Presbyterian church influence America morally socially and politically?
The Presbyterian church believed decisions should be made by elders and authority should be divided among several people, like the branches of the U.S. government.
Morally acceptable legal separation?
Any legal separation is morally acceptable.Any legal separation is morally acceptable.Any legal separation is morally acceptable.Any legal separation is morally acceptable.
What are the different things you have to do to protect your envirorment?
In many areas recycling is compulsory. One must also properly dispose of chemicals such as spent motor oil and antifreeze. Morally and Economically it is only logical to try to consume as little energy as possible.
What was the European justification for slavery?
Europeans justified slavery by arguing that it was economically necessary for their overseas colonies, as well as morally acceptable due to the belief in the superiority of European culture and religion. It was also seen as a way to civilize and Christianize indigenous populations.
