Like any other aspect of Roman life, prisoners were treated according to their status. In other words, class counted. If the prisoner were a criminal of some type, the lower classed person would be punished quickly, while the elite could drag out his trial. The punishments for the lower classes were fines, or working to make restitution; the punishments for the wealthy were fines or even exile, depending upon thecrime. Since Rome had no long term prisons, justice was dispensed quickly to the poor, while the wealthy were allowed to remain at home during their trial.
Prisoners of war were generally sold into slavery and their treatment depended upon their attitude, their education, and their skills.
Prisoners in ancient Rome were often subject to harsh treatment. They were kept in crowded and unsanitary cells, and physical punishments such as flogging or torture were common. Some prisoners were used as gladiators or slaves, while others faced execution. The treatment of prisoners varied depending on their social status, crimes committed, and the whims of the ruling authorities.
No, no, and no. Gladiators had nothing to do with the military unless they happened to be prisoners of war. Military heroes were honored and held in high esteem in ancient Rome. The gladiators were at the bottom of society.
Australian POWs were treated as appallingly as other whites in Japanese camps. They were used as slave labour.
In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.
There was not a prince in ancient Rome.
how do you get places in ancient Rome
A prisoner in Ancient Rome who got a disease would be looked after. We are talking about mainly prisoners of war, because custodial sentences were rare.
No, no, and no. Gladiators had nothing to do with the military unless they happened to be prisoners of war. Military heroes were honored and held in high esteem in ancient Rome. The gladiators were at the bottom of society.
If they are rich they can be treated fairly well...
Utilizing prisoners productively rather than slaves will not burden the unemployment basket of the country.
Rome had many people from different places in it's country. this means that their army was mostly non-natives/prisoners so they did not really want to fight for a place that they didn't like.
You have just been pranked by the prank patrol :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
Australian POWs were treated as appallingly as other whites in Japanese camps. They were used as slave labour.
In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.
they arn't treated very well at all
There was not a prince in ancient Rome.
how do you get places in ancient Rome
In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.