Britain treated prisoners generally very well, but not during the moment of surrender. Soldiers trying to surrender in WWI were treated poorly by every combatant country, will high percentages being killed. Soldiers were generally safer surrendering in large groups.
Prisoners who made it to the U.S. during WWII were treated very well. Most of the POW camps were located in rural areas. Since most of the working age men were either in factories or in the war, prisoners were allowed into the towns to help repair farm equipment, help with harvest or planting. They were not allowed under international treaties to work on anything directly related to the war effort, such as military weapons or vehicles or ammunition - but they could help families here in the states to get by.
Probably the same as white prisoners due to the fact there f**ing prisoners.
They treated the US soldiers terribly.
No.
They were held as prisoners of war. What that entailed depended upon the "enemy" who caught them. In Britain we often made prisoners of war work, but on the whole we treated them fairly well. In Japan many prisoners were treated extremely badly and were frequently tortured.
It was not uncommon for rogue commanders to have prisoners executed. This was true for both sides of the conflict.
In the civil war slaves were still slaves but still, they were with the enemy and were as such treated as the enemy.
They treated the US soldiers terribly.
They treated them very well
Very well
No.
They were treated in accordance with the Geneva Convention. Australian prisoners of the Japanese were not.
They were held as prisoners of war. What that entailed depended upon the "enemy" who caught them. In Britain we often made prisoners of war work, but on the whole we treated them fairly well. In Japan many prisoners were treated extremely badly and were frequently tortured.
very porly, only the treatment of Jews was worse.
The axis treated their prisoners horribly. They experimented on them and tortured them. They would burn them and make them freeze to death. they would hardly ever feed them and never give them showers.
they arn't treated very well at all
It was not uncommon for rogue commanders to have prisoners executed. This was true for both sides of the conflict.
very badly, only slightly better than Jews were treated
In the civil war slaves were still slaves but still, they were with the enemy and were as such treated as the enemy.