Slaves' lives didn't matter to anyone. An owner of a slave could do anything to them. They thought of slaves as items you buy instead of human beings. If a slave didn't work hard, their owner usually didn't treat their slave well. Some owners treated their slaves well, so they would do good work because slaves were very expensive.
Quite! disobedience, slacking or goldbricking was dealt with swiftly and harshly, the harshness accelerated for repeaters and runaways were sometimes simply murder as a warning to others Killing your slave for some minor infraction would be like a modern farmer deliberately driving his tractor off a cliff because it had a flat tire. You don't destroy an expensive piece of property that provides your livelihood. Few, if any, slaveowners were as evil as Simon Legree in Uncle Tom's Cabin. Slaves were provided with food and shelter, and rudimentary medical care. What we would consider minimum medical care today didn't even exist in the 1860s, so even wealthy people did not have good medical services. There were even laws preventing a slave owner from abandoning a slave who was disabled or too old to work.
slaves were treated very horrible they were whipped till scared, almost even to death they were treated worse than animals and marked like them to be sold.
really good they had it all
It was brutal because Stalin didn't regard human life and treated his subjects worse than slaves.
The slaves were not treated good at all I guess you can try to imagine jail now and then multiply it by 100 and then you will see how the slaves were treated.
He gave the shelter, food and water. They were close.
In the middle of 18 to 1900s, they were treated as slaves.
in the early part of the Victorian era slaves were treated equally to the past although many states had banned slavery as in the relation ship to the Victorian era to how slaves are treated i see no relation.
It was brutal because Stalin didn't regard human life and treated his subjects worse than slaves.
Brutal justice is brutal justice...Brutal: A brutal act or person is cruel or violentJustice: The fairness in the way that people are treated
To compel compliance.
slaves thought the war was brutal and they did not want to be a part of it.
Slaves in Brazil were subjected to harsh treatment, including physical abuse, long hours of labor, and poor living conditions. Many faced violence, exploitation, and separation from their families. Slavery in Brazil was abolished in 1888.
The slaves were not treated good at all I guess you can try to imagine jail now and then multiply it by 100 and then you will see how the slaves were treated.
He gave the shelter, food and water. They were close.
Mayan slaves were typically treated poorly, subjected to harsh working conditions, physical abuse, and inadequate living conditions. They had limited rights and freedoms, often forced to work in agriculture, construction, or domestic service. Slavery was an important aspect of the Mayan economy and society, with slaves being considered the property of their owners.
Women and slaves were treated unfairly because they were not allowed to be citizens,vote, and did not have any rights.there were no slaves in Sparta, and the women were treated with dignity.
Women and slaves were treated unfairly because they were not allowed to be citizens,vote, and did not have any rights.there were no slaves in Sparta, and the women were treated with dignity.
'Sold down South' or 'Sold down the river' refered to the generally more brutal treatment slaves received in Mississippi and Louisiana. The Confederate president Jefferson Davis was unusual in being a Mississippi landowner who treated his slaves so well that they didn't want their freedom.
It was called brutal because the slaves put on the boat were put through very harsh conditions.