What will be the outcome of world war 3?

Answer 1

The world wont look like anyhting after world war 3 if it happens.Already the most powerful countries in the world have nuclear weapons and the only real way a world war can begin is if one of these countries like the usa is in it and a war with nuclear weapons will be a very quick one.Like Einstein said 'if world war 3 is fought with nuclear weapons then world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones'.If that is true you can get an idea of what it will be like after world war 3.Chances are there wont be another world war in our lifetime anyway.

Answer 2

I think Einstein said it best: "I'm not sure what World War 3 will be fought with, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." That's a loose quote, but basically we're all screwed.

Answer 3

Albert Einstein said, "I have no idea what World War 3 will be like, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones."

Today several countries have nuclear capability: The United States, Russia, China, England, France, India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, and perhaps Syria. When the United States invaded Iraq, Saddam Hussain sent hundreds of trucks from his palaces to Syria. Syria began building the facility to build nuclear weapons. Israel bombed that facility. Syria probably has the plans tucked away in other places.

Almost any country can build a rocket that can carry a nuclear bomb a thousand miles.

While anthrax in in the soil and anyone who works in the dirt touches it every day, free anthrax does not normally get in the lungs. It can become airborne when cattle graze on bone dry grass and pull up the grass by the roots rather than cut it off. Then it kills the cows. Warring nations can spread anthrax through the air of their enemies. If the people breathe the air, it will kill them.

Many other techniques exist for wiping out the population of an enemy.

You may ask why this is important. During the 30s Spain had a Civil War. Germany and Italy supported the rebels financially and with war materiel. Foreign nations supported the Spanish Civil War.

Today, terrorists exist. They do not support themselves. The governments of various nations support them. When one terrorist is killed, the terrorist organization recruits another. Only by ending the governments supporting terrorism can the various nations make a dent in the problem.

Thus, if World War 3 started tomorrow, it would be necessary to wipe out all the capital cities of all nations with governments giving financial support of terrorists. Yes, that would kill innocent civilians, still, it is more important to destroy the government than to worry about the innocent. That would use nuclear weapons. It would also be necessary to wipe out all military bases. That would also require nuclear weapons. (It is not enough to kill the people. The weapons must also be destroyed.) Wiping out the areas inhabited by terrorists could be done by anthrax. The anthrax would go into the soil fairly soon and become harmless while the population would be dead.

Since the surrounding nations fear a mass exodus from North Korea, it would be necessary to kill enough of the population to kill a large percentage of the population to feed the remainder.

On the other hand it could simply start simply by first killing every one in the capital cities of Iran and North Korea. That could stop terrorism cold or it could lead to major warfare.

Answer 4

many people believe so because bombs are so advanced they can ruin the world however i dont think that someone in their right mind would actually use bombs that will end the world because that defeats the purpose of a war...so no the world will not end

Answer 5

All we can say is "I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

-Albert Einstein