0
How would a knight's life have been different if feudalism fell?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Good question! Well knights may not of been very rich and may of not existed! The Feudalism system says that to become a knight, you must be of noble birth and had to be trained in a wide verity of weapons. Why? It's because back in those days, armor was very expensive. It would be very hard to become a knight when you couldn't afford armor. Another thing that may of happened is that the knights wouldn't be granted any land. To get more and more land, they would have to spend more and more time in military service. If knights couldn't get armor which meant they weren't really knights, they wouldn't get land and so, not very rich. Another note is that the framework of the government would fall causing much bickering and fights. Hope this helps!
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did the feudal system develop during the middle ages?
The problem in answering this question stems from the exact meaning of feudalism, an issue on which many scholars find disagreement. Feudalism was characterised by a social hierarchy - king, lords, knights and serfs being important examples. Feudalism protected the position of the king, by ensuring the loyalty and service of the lords and knights, in return for position and favours. But feudalism, as we understand it, could probably not have existed without the serfs. When the supply of slaves, from central and eastern Europe, dried up in the tenth century, serfdom became the answer. Landholders also found that serfs were not only cheaper, but easier to manage than slaves had been.
What was it like to be a atilliator in the medieval times?
medieval atilliator makes crossbows for knights in the army. They are highly paid.
What countries live under feudalism today?
No country used a full feudalistic type of government today. Some countries like India, Pakistan, and parts of Africa, Scotland and England have been accused of operating under a Feudalistic or Semi Feudalistic type of government. The last state in Europe to be run under true Feudalism was the British controlled island of Sark, which implemented a Democracy in April of 2008.
What would happen if the people of the eastern and western hemisphere never had contact with one another?
The western hemisphere's continents would have no human inhabitants. The Native Americans came from Asia, presumably over the land bridge before it was flooded over from rising waters, so they never would have lived in the Americas had they not first entered the western hemisphere themselves. But if you intended a scenerio where the Native Americans did populate America, and the Europeans didn't discover it, then it would not be called the Americas after Amerigo Vespuchi, and the Indians would not have the politicaly incorect designation as Indians either. There would have to be very different history. Had the Vikings not visited the western hemisphere, and raided Indian settlements along the east coast (long before the spanish visited), the development of society there would have surely taken a different path. Perhaps the Mound Builders would never have vanished, and perhaps conflicts between the Native American empires would have spurred technological innovations the likes of which have never been seen. If this bizarre plot were to unfold further with no contact between the two sides of the Earth, then it could have been Native American armies which ultimately conquered the decaying empires of Europe. WW1, WW2, the space race, all could have very easily been removed from history had anything been different, but if this scenerio happened, who knows what would be different by this time. With the absence of WW1 and 2, warfare would be carried out differently, the Arian race or whatever would have been annihilated by the red master race instead of causing so much terror to the world themselves, and perhaps feeble and submissive caucasians would now be typical slaves, the strong having been eliminated by the invaders. And people would wonder what would be different, had the Europeans or even the Asians discovered the continents of the western hemisphere before the western hemisphere discovered them. Contact between the two hemispheres was inevitable. But if events had transpired in such a way that contact was postponed, something like this could have happened.
How has the wheelbarrow or changed over time?
its been made in different types in different countries over about the last 500 years
What languages did knights speak?
It depended on what country they lived in and what era you're talking about. There have been knights in many different countries.
How did the Hundred Years' War contribute the end of medieval Europe?
The Hundred Years War helped to end feudalism because the kings began to rely on hired soldiers instead of feudal knights. Knights fighting on behalf of the king had been an essential feature of the feudal system.
Did knights have a bridle on their horse?
Yes. Without it it would have been difficult to control their horse.
Which of the following would not have been an early goal of the knights of labor?
to end the practice of slavery
Which group would have been most likely to criticize the Knights of Labor?
skilled workers
What would not have been an early goal of the Knights of Laborg?
An early goal of the Knights of Labor would not have been to advocate for the elimination of workers' rights or to support oppressive labor practices. Instead, their goals included the pursuit of fair wages, reduced working hours, and improved working conditions for all workers, regardless of gender or race. The Knights of Labor also aimed to unite workers and promote solidarity among different labor groups.
Can you give an example of a sentence using the word feudalism?
The governments of Europe for much of the last 1,500 years have been various forms of feudalism.
Why did the feudal system develop during the middle ages?
The problem in answering this question stems from the exact meaning of feudalism, an issue on which many scholars find disagreement. Feudalism was characterised by a social hierarchy - king, lords, knights and serfs being important examples. Feudalism protected the position of the king, by ensuring the loyalty and service of the lords and knights, in return for position and favours. But feudalism, as we understand it, could probably not have existed without the serfs. When the supply of slaves, from central and eastern Europe, dried up in the tenth century, serfdom became the answer. Landholders also found that serfs were not only cheaper, but easier to manage than slaves had been.
Does Europe have feudalism?
Feudalism is a term used for a set of political and military customs in medieval Europe that flourished between the ninth and fifteenth centuries. In the present day, and it has been so for many centuries, Europe does not have feudalism.
How were the knights of labor different from most of the other unions?
the Knights of Labor became a national labor organization in the 1880's. Unlike most union's Knights recruited people who had been kept out of trade unions including women, African Americans, immigrants, and unskilled laborers.
How many Knights were a part of the round table?
Their were 13 Knights of the round table originally but because Arthurian Legend is as said a Legend and can not be proven outright and due to the different variants of the legend most are inclined to believe that their were 13 Knights originally but may have been around 25.
Which of the following would not have been an early goal of the knights of lador?
Establishing trade routes with the Far East would not have been an early goal of the Knights of Labor, as their primary focus was on improving working conditions and rights for laborers in the United States.
