It had potentially 2 million people able to be called out across the empire, supplied by the many peoples who made up the Empire. It had a core of professional troops - infantry and cavalry who were the mobile troops able to go to trouble spots, with the majority locals with limited capability and mobility, used for local problems. The invasion force mounted of Xerxes amounted to two army corps, each of five infantry divisions and one cavalry division (2 x 60,000), not the overall 2 million cited by Herodotus who was describing the overall assets of the Empire. It was supplied by sea, which was the only practicable way of supporting such a large force in a pre-mechanical transport era. Its strength was in the cavalry, which had to protect the unarmoured infantry against the armoured Greek soldiers.
The Persians would have won if Sparta and Athens had not united to fight the Persian Army
Alexander the Great defeated the Persian empire
The small Greek force at Thermopylae was defeated by the Persian army in 480 BCE.
After defeating the Greek navies at Artemesium, the Persian army moved to Athens and occupied it.
479 BCE.
Loyal and self disciplined
The Persians would have won if Sparta and Athens had not united to fight the Persian Army
obviously army to army Persians would win by tactics but one to one a barbarian would win
Alexander the Great defeated the Persian empire
great
The strong army that Alexander defeated was the Persian Army
They played a key role by helping sparta with a better sea army in the war
Being outmanoeuvred by Alexander the Great - who first slaughtered Greeks who were bolstering up the Persian army, then putting an end to the Persian fleet by occupying their bases in the Mediterranean, then capturing the Persian treasury which enabled him to pay his army, and inflicting a final land defeat of the Persian army.
yes
Who is 'you do'.
The Persian army, and the armies of the Greek city-states.
The Persian army, and the armies of the Greek city-states.