Want this question answered?
all of the above-apexvs
Their conviction was based on their politics and their ethnicity
The Italian immigrants, Sacco and Vanzetti, were arrested for an armed robbery in South Braintree, Massachusetts, in which a guard and a paymaster were killed. They were promptly found guilty and sentenced to die in the electric chair. The newly formed American Civil Liberties Union, Italian-American groups, and labor organizations publicized the fact that there was no hard evidence against the two and some of the evidence was invented by the prosecution The Judge at their trial was openly prejudiced against the Italians and called them "damned dagos." Sacco and Vanzetti admitted to being radicals in their political beliefs but proclaimed their innocence of the crime. The case received world wide attention and even the Italian Dictator Mussolini expressed that he felt the guilty verdict was wrong. Regardless, Sacco and Vanzetti were executed in 1927. Research later indicated that Sacco probably was guilty of the murders and probably had Vanzetti's help in the robbery. Unfortunately, at that time in American history, most Americans were anti-immigrant and glad to see anarchists and radicals punished, whether they were guilty or not.
Sacco and Vanzetti. Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were Italian born anarchists and labour activists who lived in the United States. In the 20's they were framed for a robbery in which a security guard was murdered. Although they were not guilty, they were both executed on the basis of flimsy evidence. During the 20's there was an extreme red scare and the authorities were intent upon crushing any form of dissent. The judge in the case was quoted in the case: This man, although he may not have actually committed the crime attributed to him, is nevertheless morally culpable, because he is the enemy of our existing institutions. The foreman of the jury also believed they were enemies of the state and should be hanged whether they were guilty or not. The judge later boasted to his friends about his giving the death sentence to Sacco and Vanzetti: Did you see what I did to those anarchist bastards the other day Sacco and Vanzetti were political scapegoats. They appealled their death sentence for 6 years and were executed August 23rd 1927. After their execution, thousands took to the streets in protest all around the world.
The Palmer Raids occurred during a time when Americans were fearful of anarchists, communists, and immigrants in general. Italians were considered to all be mobsters or criminals, or radicals or anarchists. The Attorney-General took advantage of those feelings to advance his political career by rounding up immigrants and those he accused or assumed to be anarchists. The Italian immigrants, Sacco and Vanzetti, were arrested for an armed robbery in South Braintree, Massachusetts, in which a guard and a paymaster were killed. They were promptly found guilty and sentenced to die in the electric chair. The newly formed American Civil Liberties Union, Italian-American groups, and labor organizations publicized the fact that there was no hard evidence against the two and some of the evidence was invented by the prosecution The Judge at their trial was openly prejudiced against the Italians and called them "damned dagos." Sacco and Vanzetti admitted to being radicals in their political beliefs but proclaimed their innocence of the crime.
Sacco and Vanzetti were not acquitted.
What was the name of lawyer that defended sacco and vanzetti case
Many felt that Sacco and Vanzetti were convicted because of xenophobia.
Nicola Sacco has written: 'The Sacco-Vanzetti case' -- subject(s): Sacco-Vanzetti Trial, Dedham, Mass., 1921
Many Felt that Sacco and Vanzetti were convicted because of xenophobia. (Apex)
Many felt that sacco and vanzetti were convicted because of xenophobia
all of the above-apexvs
The Sacco-Vanzetti case was during the Red Scare in the 1920s, when fears of communism and anarchism were rampant in the United States. The case of Italian immigrants Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, who were convicted of robbery and murder, became a symbol of anti-immigrant and anti-radical sentiments of the time, fueling the Red Scare hysteria.
sacco and vanzetti supported anarchism but didnt hate america. they were convicted because of their anarchist beliefs which goes against their constitutional rights.
try going on wikipedia it helps more...
One famous court case of the 1920s was the Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925. This trial centered around a high school teacher, John Scopes, who was accused of violating a Tennessee law by teaching evolution in the classroom. The trial gained national attention and highlighted the tension between science and religion in American society at the time.
Robert H. Montgomery has written: 'Sacco-Vanzetti' -- subject(s): Sacco-Vanzetti Trial, Dedham, Mass., 1921, Sacco-Vanzetti case, Trials (Murder)