Send a beam of electrons through a crystal structure. If DeBroglie is correct, then the scattering of these electrons will exhibit interference patterns, with wavelengths equal to the DeBroglie Wavelength. If he is wrong, no such interference pattern will be seen.
Such interference patterns have been unambiguously seen for decades, starting in 1927.
To prove the hypothesis. To disprove the hypothesis.
An experiment can prove or disprove a hypothesis.
It is impossible to prove a hypothesis. It can only be disproved.
It is impossible to prove a hypothesis. It can only be disproved.
Generally, creating a hypothesis is a no-win situation. The hypothesis you devise must be provable false. Your data will either prove your hypothesis false or it will fail to prove the hypothesis false. You can never prove a proper hypothesis true. Science does not prove truth, it simply discards the false.
That depends on the result of the experiment. The experiment is a way to test a hypothesis, and it's completely fine if the experiment disproves the hypothesis. Ideally, though, the experiment will support the hypothesis.
No. Not being able to prove something is NOT the same as it being true.
conducting experiment
It can be proven, you have to do at least 3 experiments to prove your hypothesis.
Ido
Yes
it is important to write a conclusion to prove a hypothesis because then you have no evidence if your hypothesis was tested or correct or not. from Rezwan Haque I.S.204 Academy Harvord. class 620