Beautiful ! If you could do that, then you could catch enough from the output to put back in and
keep the machine running, and still have some left over to sell. You could file for a patent, so that
nobody else could ever steal your idea, and you could call it something like "Perpetual Motion".
You'd have to be careful though. Your machine would be creating energy. If that continued for long,
it's anybody's guess what the cataclysmic results might be. I sure wouldn't want to be around when
all heck broke loose, and pieces of it hit the fan.
No, I think some ideas are better left untested. I beg you: don't go through with this scheme.
It can only lead to tragedy and unhappiness.
But seriously folks. It's impossible.
No. And you cannot make it greater THAN the input, either.
No - that would violate Conservation of Energy. So far, there is no known process that violates Conservation of Energy, and it doesn't seem likely that one will ever be found.
The energy that is used to make the machine work.
Well, its not that hard: Some machines help people do work by changing the size of the force needed. Have you ever tried opening a door by turning the shaft instead of the handle? Not as simple. It takes less force to use the handle instead of the shaft. If a machine (doorknob attached to shaft) allows you to exert less force, you must apply that force over a greater distance. the complete and total amount of work done remains the same, whether its by machine or not. Because a machine does not change the amount of work to be done, less force must mean greater distance. So: Machine=less force BUT greater distance!
That is not possible. For more information, do some reading on the "Law of Conservation of Energy". More specifically, no cases are known of this law being violated, and no mechanism is known that might make this even remotely possible.
No. And you cannot make it greater THAN the input, either.
No - that would violate Conservation of Energy. So far, there is no known process that violates Conservation of Energy, and it doesn't seem likely that one will ever be found.
It can either increase or decrease the output force, as compared to the input force. The output force may also be equal to the input force.
In any practical machine, the power output is less than the power input. In other words, the efficiency of real machines is less than 1.smaller thanalways
If you want to make an exact copy of a recording from machine "A" to machine "B", a dubbing cord goes from the output terminals of machine "A" to the input terminals of machine "B". The word "dub" means "a copy of" in recorded music.
You draw a rectangle and then you divide it into to 2 equal parts (split it down the middle). After you do that you label the input side x and the output side y. And now you got an input output chart.
The energy that is used to make the machine work.
The energy that is used to make the machine work.
I enjoyed your input into our discussion; now I've my own output to contribute.
do you mean science? input is what you start with, output is what you get. for instance to make scrambled eggs, we input milk and eggs (minus the shells!) to a pan, add heat, stir and we get out tasty scrambled eggs. there are many types of input and output.
yes
Both. There's a touch panel that is used to feed information in to the device (input) and a screen underneath the touch panel to display stuff (output). This makes it to be both input and output.