No. Should be -- I am coming on the field trip.
Also no 'as' at the end
No, "quicklyer" is not a recognized word in the English language. The comparative form of "quick" is "quicker."
This phrase is often used as a mnemonic for spelling the word "accompany." Each grouping of letters represents a syllable in the word: the (the), quick (qu), er (er), pick (com), her (pan), upper (y).
There is no definitive answer to why girls tend to learn to talk quicker than boys, but some theories suggest it may be due to differences in brain development, exposure to language at an early age, and social interactions. Genetics and individual differences also play a role in language development.
To learn German quicker, immerse yourself in the language as much as possible. Practice regularly by speaking with native speakers, watching German movies or TV shows, and listening to German music. Utilize language learning apps, flashcards, and textbooks to reinforce your knowledge. Additionally, find a language exchange partner to practice speaking and writing with.
She was always viewed as a plodder in school, only moving forward slowly with her work while others excelled at a quicker pace.
IS THAT CORRECT : "Good evening, Sorry for replying so late but I was really busy and I promise I will try to answer quicker next time! I am sending you this email to say that I am coming at the field trip as Korinne who asked me if I can tell you that she is coming too. Yours truly Heaven Tylor" ?
No, it is incorrect. The correct terms are just 'quicker' or 'more quickly'.
That is the correct spelling of "quicker" (faster).
Well a quicker way to helping your back, is sleeping on a plain floor. Therefore your muscles are evening off.
Our oldest cat is faster than our youngest dog **** "Quicker" is OK too, but leave out the "more." "Quicker" means "more quick."
Thank you for your quick reply
correct routing to destination and ensures quicker delivery.
Yes, but not formally. It can be an adverb when it means "more quickly" which is the grammatically correct form.
33. But it would have been easier and quicker to use a calculator! And you cannot be sure that this answer is correct!
182. It would have been quicker using your calculator and you still can't be sure I have got the correct answer.
0.25 * 5 = 1.25 It would have been quicker to use a calculator and you cannot be sure that I have got the correct answer!
WikiAnswers relies on the answers of its Contributors; be patient and your question will be answered! Ensuring that it has correct spelling and is placed in the correct categories will help it be answered quicker.