Want this question answered?
Pathos
When we study the motive of a primary source's writer, we're looking into issues of potential:
When we study the motive of a primary source's writer, we're looking into issues of potential:
Who is j k rolling? Whoever she is, she's obviously not a writer like J. K. Rowling. This rolling woman has terrible spelling; writing her name without any periods or capitals.
By looking at a story's turning points
No its not logos its pathos
The full question with choices was:Which of the following would you be looking for as a critical reader with an eye toward ethos in an op-ed piece?A) The writer's use of emotion to attempt to persuade the readerB) The argument the writer makes and the strength of that argumentC) Any potential bias the writer may have and the level of knowledge or expertise the writer may have on the topicD) None of the above.The answer would be: C) Any potential bias the writer may have and the level of knowledge or expertise the writer may have on the topicEthos... = Writer or persona. You are looking for bias toward the subject. That's the writer.
A content writer, also known a quantitative writer, knows in advance what they are looking for and will use numerical data. This type of writer takes more of an objective approach while a qualitative writer can become subjectively immersed in the subject matter.
You would want to look for the writer's use of credible sources, well-reasoned arguments, and balanced perspective. Bias can be identified through the writer's tone, language, selective use of evidence, or presence of conflicting interests. Assessing the writer's level of expertise involves examining their qualifications, previous experience with the topic, and consistency in presenting accurate information.
bias
It doesn't necessarily mean you have writer's block. To help you get back on track with your writing I suggest looking at the following link.
Maybe if the director, writer or special effects persons wants them to.