The full question with choices was:
Which of the following would you be looking for as a critical reader with an eye toward ethos in an op-ed piece?
A) The writer's use of emotion to attempt to persuade the reader
B) The argument the writer makes and the strength of that argument
C) Any potential bias the writer may have and the level of knowledge or expertise the writer may have on the topic
D) None of the above.
The answer would be: C) Any potential bias the writer may have and the level of knowledge or expertise the writer may have on the topic
Ethos... = Writer or persona. You are looking for bias toward the subject. That's the writer.
The argument the writer makes and the strength of that argument
Any potential bias the writer may have and the level of knowledge or expertise the writer may have on the topic
You would want to look for the writer's use of credible sources, well-reasoned arguments, and balanced perspective. Bias can be identified through the writer's tone, language, selective use of evidence, or presence of conflicting interests. Assessing the writer's level of expertise involves examining their qualifications, previous experience with the topic, and consistency in presenting accurate information.
A. potential bias. B. level of knowledge. C. use of persuasive writing tools. D. All of the above
A critical reader with an eye toward logos would be looking for any potential bias the writer might have as well his or her level of knowledge on the subject.
I am looking for a man of experience with expertise in these matters.
critical reading
A critical reader of an op-ed piece who is looking for pathos is trying to find emotional appeals.
A critical reader of an op-ed piece who is looking for pathos is trying to find emotional appeals.
When we study the motive of a primary source's writer, we're looking into issues of potential:
When we study the motive of a primary source's writer, we're looking into issues of potential:
Logical arguments
looking for biases and implied messages.