He/She is a Veitnam Era Veteran.
There is actually a code (or at least during the Viet War there was) that designates VETERAN status. And that code cannot (or could not) be awarded until completion of military duty which satisifed that code's requirement. Therefore; if a veteran (an honorably discharged serviceman) re-enlisted into the US military...he would be a former veteran on active duty.
In the context of the Korean War or any other military conflict, a "veteran" is any person who has gone into combat and then returned, whether with wounds to show for it or unharmed. In other words, someone who has experienced war personally through military service during an actual conflict is considered to be a true "veteran".
For the same reason's other people are homeless. The rule is this: if a person has a specific personality before that individual went into the service...that person may still have that personality when the individual leaves the service; but that personality be expand or regress...based upon the life experiences of that particular individual. Only a truly "shell-shocked" man, who was perfectly normal before he went in (to the service), may be mentally influenced after the war...to become homeless. And in such an event, the VA is there to help him. During the Vietnam "era" it WAS the Veteran's Administration Hospital's policy to NEVER turn down a veteran.
You would call them veteran!
After someone has served in the military they are called a veteran.
He is a Vietnam Era Veteran.
Yes that is correct
There is actually a code (or at least during the Viet War there was) that designates VETERAN status. And that code cannot (or could not) be awarded until completion of military duty which satisifed that code's requirement. Therefore; if a veteran (an honorably discharged serviceman) re-enlisted into the US military...he would be a former veteran on active duty.
A military veteran is anyone who has worn the uniform of their nation's military and rendered honorable service with an honorable discharge. In the U.S. this includes Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Coast Guard and any National Guard or Reservists who have been deployed for active duty service at the federal level for more than 180 days.
No. H.R. 1025 passed the House in 2012 but has not yet passed the Senate. Currently, you are only considered a veteran if you served on a Title 10 tour of duty. 99% of all National Guard active duty is served on Title 32. H.R. 1025 won't cost the government a penny, but until it becomes law, service in the National Guard does not make a person a veteran.
Only active-duty members of the US Armed Forces (with a very few exceptions) can come under the classification of "veterans" for governmental purposes (e.g. the Veterans Administration).
180 days of Active Service and an Honorable Discharge My father was in the navy and it didn't have anything to do with how long he served. He is considered a veteran and it often refers to retired armed services personnel. A veteran is one who has served in the armed forces and has an honorable discharge. A common misconception is that one had to have either been in combat and/or has retired from active duty to be called a veteran.
Why not? If a person has EVER worn the military uniform of their nation, they are a veteran.
It usually varies around 640 to 850. It also depends on the person. If they have paralyzed muscles, they are not considered active.
Veteran
Any person who has ever served their nation in a military uniform is a veteran.
Military nurse in war,YES...a military veteran. Civilian nurse in war, YES...a VETERAN of her occupation but not a MILITARY Veteran. Another words, the word "Veteran" is not strictly a military term. A person can be a veteran doctor, veteran lawyer, veteran school teacher, etc. Veteran means someone that has been doing that job/occupation for a long time.