Want this question answered?
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
The scientific theory should be changed.
They should do the same experiment because if one scientist makes a mistake, it can be corrected.
Attempt to control the conditions
Attempt to control the conditions
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
The scientific theory should be changed.
The scientist or student scientist should review the results. Conclusions should be drawn based on the results. Then, the hypothesis is reviewed to make sure the results confirm the hypothesis; if not, revise the hypothesis and rerun the experiment.
The results go against the thinking of society.
They should do the same experiment because if one scientist makes a mistake, it can be corrected.
Attempt to control the conditions
Attempt to control the conditions
Scientists test hypotheses using the scientific method. First, there is a question posed about a phenomenon. Then, the hypothesis is created about what the scientist thinks will happen when it is tested. Next, the scientist will create an experiment that will answer the question. With this, the scientist gathers materials and performs the experiment they designed. The experiment should include a control group (one that does not have anything changed), that way you can see the difference between variables. The scientist can only change one variable at a time. As the scientist is conducting the experiment, they should be logging at the results. Once the experiment is done, they should look at the data and see what it proves. Does it prove the hypothesis? Does it go against the hypothesis? Next, scientists generally see how they can apply the results to real life. This goes a little bit beyond your question, but an understanding of the scientific method is important to understanding how hypotheses are tested.
Scientists make more mistakes than not. It is part of the business and why they call their work "experiments". As a working scientists you try to keep your basics constant. You control the pH of your solutions, the don't switch suppliers for even basic salts mid-experiment. Most importantly you repeat experiments several times and use statistical analysis to support your conclusions. The goal of scientist is to have his/her results confirmed by repetition by others. If it isn't reproducible than it isn't believable. But wrong conclusions.... Record your mistake in the results and talk about it in the conclusion/examination of data.
An experiment which can be repeated and will yield the same results. Ex. If x+y=z in the experiement if you try the experiment again you should get the same result "z".
No redo the experiment.
The scientist should prepare a culture of the cells. (apex)