Yes, (subject to policy exclusions and your state law regarding uninsured unlicensed drivers), the person that is negligent, at fault is the one responsible for the damages to the 'innocent' party. Regardless of their licensing/insurance in most cases.
It is highly unlikely.
The majority of the time no because it is an insured's policyholder's duty not to let unlicensed people driver their car because they cannot legally drive.
Bad things, will mostly likely get a few citation from police. If he is found to be at fault he could be liable for the damage.
Yes. It is the responsibility of the at-fault party to pay for the damage caused in an accident, regardless of the license or insurance status of the not at-fault party.
The injury would most likely not be covered under your auto because you let an unlicensed driver drive your vehicle when they cannot legally drive.
If the accident was caused by the uninsured driver than the uninsured driver is definitely still responsible.
bananners!
If the uninsured driver had the permission of the insured driver to operate the vehicle then NOTHING will happen to the uninsured driver. In fact, in this case he or she is not an uninsured driver at all. The insurance follows the vehicle first, the driver second.
My insurance canceled uninsured person hits someone in rear what happens to me
If you have Auto liability Insurance and you gave this person perrmission to drive, The Insurer will probably have to pay the bill for the accident. The company will then probably have to promptly cancel your insurance coverage for allowing an unsinsured unlicensed driver to operate your vehicle. Your next Auto Insurance Policy premium will take into account your claims history and charge accordingly.
Maybe. Did the unlicensed driver have your permission to be operating the car when the accident occurred? If so, maybe not.
They will have to take the uninsured driver to court. Or if you have uninsured driver policy with your insurance, they will pay it.