No, financial matters are separate from custodial issues. The matter of health insurance should be a part of the support order not a custodial one.
The courts will determine who gets custody of the child. The courts will consider what is in the best interest of the child.
If you were married to him when you gave birth to the children he is presumed, by law, to be their father. If you are still married he doesn't need to petition for custody but he can petition for visitations. If you know he is not the father then you should consult with an attorney who specializes in custody issues to determine your options under the law in your jurisdiction.
No. If your father has custody you cannot make that decision until you reach eighteen unless your father consents to a change in the custody order.No. If your father has custody you cannot make that decision until you reach eighteen unless your father consents to a change in the custody order.No. If your father has custody you cannot make that decision until you reach eighteen unless your father consents to a change in the custody order.No. If your father has custody you cannot make that decision until you reach eighteen unless your father consents to a change in the custody order.
The father would be the favored person to get legal custody if the mother had custody and died unless he was found to be unfit to have custody.
* The insurance plan of the parent with legal custody of the child. * The plan of the spouse of the parent with legal custody of the child. * Last is the plan of the parent who does not have legal custody of the child. * ** There can be some discrepancy, depending on a court decree, if there are no specific terms on a court decree (stating only that the parents share joint custody), the benefit determination would be the same as the first bullet above where if the parents are not separated or divorced, the insurance of the parent whose birthday occurs first in a calendar year is considered the primary insurance while the other paren'ts benefits are considered the secondary coverage.
If the father has legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has joint legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has sole legal custody, yes.If the father has legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has joint legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has sole legal custody, yes.If the father has legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has joint legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has sole legal custody, yes.If the father has legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has joint legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has sole legal custody, yes.
Joint custody is between two parents, which are usually a mother and a father.
This in of itself is not enough information to determine this. Where does she go? Are they left alone? What are the Father's problems? Etc... There are too many factors here. Off the cuff I would say: Full custody? No.
No. You need to contact the state that has custody to determine your rights. If you go and get the child you may be guilty of custodial interference.
At the nearest courthouse
No. Period. If there is no court order establishing parental responsibilities then you both have access to the child at any time. 'Go to court and get custody or leave the child out of it.
The father was awarded custody of his children.