0
If the warrant says search three days after the date judge granted and they search 5 not 3 days later is it valid?
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
You may want to find out if weekend days are included in the count. The number of days may refer to business days only.
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
If something found dureing search warrant?
Any objects found during the course of a search warrant are recorded, seized and taken as evidence. A receipt is issued and 'return of service' listing the items and facts is returned to the authorizing judge. An arrest may happen during the warrant service or at a later time.
Can a police officer release you and later issue a warrant for your arrest?
No, a police officer cannot issue a warrant for your arrest only a judge or court magistrate can do that.
Is a search conducted under the assumption that the driver has a warrant that is later found to be invalid legal?
Yes it is. So long as the officer had no reason to believe it was an invalid warrant at thetime the search was conducted, it was legal.
In Canada can you appeal a search warrant example The police show up at your door and you do not agree to the search. Can you refuse and appeal it?
A search warrant is a form of court order. You are obligated to permit the search and cooperate with the law enforcement officers serving the warrant. If you resist them, you will probably be arrested. You can later go to court and challenge the affidavit that was filed with the court when the search warrant was obtained. If your challenge is successful, it's likely that any evidence seized in the search will be suppressed.
Is giving consent to search a home the same as a search warrant?
NO, it isn't. A search warrant limits the scope of a search. Once you have consented to a search, you have placed yourself outside the protections of the fourth amendment! There is no longer any requirements of reasonability and you will likely be prevented from supressing any resulting evidence later on. NEVER consent to a search!
Can search warrant be served on Sunday?
Yes. A search warrant can be signed at anytime. After it is signed the officer has 96 hours to execute it. Normally Officers will get the warrant signed and then execute it later that night or the next morning but they can do it anytime in the valid 96 hour period. (in Illinois at least, cannot say for sure in other jurisdictions).
How long do a bench warrant last?
Contrary to popular belief/myth/legend, arrest warrants do not expire. They will always remain in NCIC (nationwide) or the state's computer system until you are apprehended and brought before a judge.
What is required to make a search warrant legal?
the crown (police) will need to have evdince against you first. this has to be solid and then taken to the magatristres court to obtain the warrent. before the warrent is issed they must first convince the judge by entring youre home they will be able to get more evidnce which will later on help porucute you in court. it usally take along time to get warent liek 2weeks and also it very exepsive so if they do do it it has to be something major i.e a muder wepaonAdded: (in the US) The information supportng the request for a warrant is called an AFFIDAVIT and must contain sufficient 'probable cause' to be legally 'sufficient' so that a judge or judicial officer will sign the affidavit. Once the affidavit is signed by a judge the warrant may be issued and served.
Is it possible a judge will release you after you've been arrested for missing a trial court date?
Yes Thought very raer to be released for a multiply FTA or MTR Warrant or in Texasa Blue Warrant for revoke probaition.However if it is for a FTA (faliure to appear) on a traffic ticket of class c mis then you pay fine and your free. If it's a blue warrant for MTR probaition warrant the judge can give a bond or no bond depending on your crime, attitude or what mood the judge the is in. I know of a case here in Texas where a nab was held oncontempt of court the judge died and he was lost in paper work. All he had to do was appolgize to the judge anyway 7 years later after judges death they found out why he was still there on a class c violation(max a fine in Texas). He is very wealthy for false imprionment civil case. In 15 years on the job only once have I seen a judge give aMTR probaitioa warrant the person a Personal Recog bond. Costs nothing to get out you are giving your word you will appear. Hope it helps BRT
When your probation runs out and you failed to pay your court fine can you go to prison in the state of Indiana?
Just make sure you go to court on the day your payment is due and ask for an extension. If you get the extension you can pay later, but if you are not granted an extension they will suspended your license. Now if you say screw it and dont go to court and dont pay the fine, the judge will send out a warrant for your arrest for failure to comply with the courts ruling. (contempt)
Can a judge convicted of a crime later practice as a judge?
no are you kidding me?
Can evidence obtained in an illegal search be used as evidence in a criminal trial?
No.Another View: The above is not a 100% factual answer. Where the law is concerned never say "never!"Virtually every defense attorney is going to challenge '''any''' evidence against their client as "fruit of the poisoned tree" whether it was illegally obtained, or not, and make the prosecution document the steps taken in recovering it.The defense MUST challenge it as inadmissible.There ARE cases where evidence challenged as "illegally obtained" HAS been ruled admissible, either by the trial court or, subsequently, on appeal.Yes, evidence obtained by an illegal search can possibly be admitted as evidence. While the default assumption is that all evidence obtained as a part of a search which is ruled illegal is inadmissible, there is a large exception. If the prosecution can show inevitable discovery of the evidence, then it can be admitted. Inevitable discovery is a concept where the discovery of the evidence would have happened during subsequent searches which were not performed because the evidence was discovered in the initial (illegal) search.For example: police are waiting for a warrant to search a warehouse of a known counterfeiter. At 10pm, the police, without the warrant, enter the warehouse based on a premise that is later ruled illegal (i.e. they conducted an illegal search at that point in time). During the 10pm search, they discover a printing press and other evidence of counterfeiting. The prosecutor, unaware of the 10pm search, gets a judge to sign the search warrant at 11pm. At trial, the presiding judge, after ruling the 10pm search illegal, would still rule that the evidence obtained from the illegal 10pm search is in fact admissible, since it would have been inevitably discovered by a search conducted at 11pm with the valid search warrant.Basically, the police have to show that in the course of their normal investigative process, they would have found the evidence by legal means.A second exception to the exclusionary rule is if the police making the search act in good faith, then, even if the search is later ruled illegal, the evidence obtained is admissible. A good faith search occurs when police, acting on information that they have no reason to doubt as genuine, nonetheless complete a search which is illegal.The two major examples of this are: police obtain a search warrant before a search. However, later on, the warrant itself is declared invalid. The search is illegal, but the evidence obtained is still admissible. The second example is when a police officer does a post-arrest search (normally allowable), but where the basis for the arrest were faulty through no fault of the arresting officer. This can occur when when a police officer checks for outstanding arrest warrants for a person, and the dispatch incorrectly indicates one exists (creating the reason for the arrest and authority to search). If a computer or records error is later shown to indicate there WAS NO arrest warrant, the police officer's search is was illegal, but the evidence is still admissible, since the officer had no reason to assume a clerical error had taken place.The restriction on the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule is that there must be no pattern of misbehavior on the police's part - that is, if the police deliberately misinform the judge to get the warrant, or if recordskeeping is known to be sloppy or negligently maintained, then the police CANNOT invoke the good faith exception, as their systemic negligence means they are now operating in bad faith.
