Yes, if the non custodial parent wanted to file suit to have the support order amended or rescinded it should have been done when the child dropped out of school and/or moved from the custodial parent's residence. A child support order is valid until the child reaches the age of majority for the state where the order was issued or the age stated in the support order or unless the order is changed or ceased by order of the court.
Continue to follow the motion of the satellite
No. She was filming as of July 2012, and plans to continue.
no because the charges has been dropped an consider that Texas is apart of the united states the charges cannot still be given to the noncustodial parent. It depends on the language of the court order. "Dropped" is not a legal term.
That is dependent on state laws and related factors. See links for help.
See links
Both sports did not receive enough votes by the International Olympic Committee members to continue
Yes, depending on state laws. But, a motion to modify can be presented to the court. see links
You may not be able to. If your children where under the age of 18 when the decree for support was created then the non-custodial parent is still responsible for that support. Only a few states back date, which means that if you had the decree written up when the child was 17 then the non-custodial parent would have to pay from the day that they left the house. States can garnish wages for back child support, and also garnish tax refunds to pay child support. If it was dropped due to the child moving out on their own at age 16, which is when a child can rent their own place in Texas, than it cannot be reengaged.
Neither the custodial parent's drug use nor the child's age is a defense against not paying past-due child support.
It would depend on why it stopped. If the non-custodial parent lost his or her job and their medical insurance along with it, the courts may not expect the unemployed parent to maintain medical insurance if doing so would be financially impossible. However, child support would continue as all states allow unemployment benefits to be garnished for that purpose. If the non-custodial parent is unemployed, it's doubtful the remaining unemployment benefits would be enough to purchase medical insurance for the child, but if the custodial parent wanted to push it, he or she could file an action against the non-custodial parent for enforcement, but you can't get blood from a turnip. All that may result is the non-custodial parent going to jail making it impossible for them to seek work and harder to find a job with an arrest record after they get out. It would be easier to see if the child qualified for Medicaid and used that until the custodial parent found another job and could put the child on the new insurance plan.If the insurance was dropped "just because", in that case, the custodial parent should file notification of violation or a motion for enforcement in the court with jurisdiction over the child.AnswerIt would depend on the laws in effect at the time (regarding to what age a child can be covered on a parents medical insurance), the separation agreement if any and any child support orders in effect. You should review all the court orders in your file and speak with an advocate at the court or an attorney if you still have questions.
Because when people see that the value has dropped some they think that it will continue to drop, so they sell sell sell and this causes the prices to drop.
The longer they delay, the more likely the plaintiff is to eitehr give up or run out of money to continue the suit, thus resulting in it being dropped.