You have to keep the times in mind the media had hyped the average man on the street into a sort of fearful frenzy. The arms lobby had an enormous amount of sway It took some time for the groundswell of protest from the younger people that were being conscripted and killed in this type of war to start to have effect, the people that did the voting in those days were used to the sort of thinking that applied during and before WW2, They were even more woefully informed then the early baby boomers, there is no comparing what effect the concentration of media ownership, and social conditioning had then as compared to now. Today they have to be far more careful about this sort of thing, however as you can see from the action taken in Iraq and Afghanistan misinformation can still be utilised to make a lot of money for the arms lobby and the corrupt.
Yes. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution authorized President Johnson to escalate the war in Vietnam.
The resolution allowed President Johnson to commit more troops to South Vietnam without the approval of Congress.
which resolution allowed president johnson to increase us involment in vietnam
It gave President Johnson power to respond against attacks on United States forces. It was passed by Congress based on incorrect information about attacks on United States forces. It allowed the bombing of North Vietnam to begin. All of the above-apex :)
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution expanded the powers of the President by giving him the authority to take military action in Vietnam without a formal declaration of war from Congress. This resolution effectively allowed the President to escalate US involvement in the Vietnam War without needing explicit permission from Congress. It is considered a significant expansion of executive power and has been used as a precedent for future military actions without congressional approval.
Johnson the united states president ordered the u.s navy and the air force to strike back at north Vietnam after they attacked U.S ships.
I think you are referring to Andrew Johnson. Jackson was president much earlier. As far as Johnson goes, he was a weak president and he allowed Radical Republicans in congress to shape much of his reconstruction policy.
Nixon's invasion (incursion) of Cambodia in '70 triggered the limitations. Unfortunately, this caused a disaster when the Laos invasion occurred the following year (1971-Operation Lam Son 719).In responding to a reported attack on U.S. warships, Congress passed a resolution giving President Lyndon Johnson authority to take "all necessary steps," including the use of American forces, in Vietnam. After the war dragged on for years, Congress decided that Johnson and President Richard Nixon had abused their war powers and passed a law to limit the president's use of forces in combat without congressional approval.
congress was angered by johnson because he allowed the southern democrat to abuse their power.
The President is Commander in Chief. Congress can advise and consent.
It demonstrated that the principle or checks and balances allowed the US Congress to impeach or indict a sitting president and potentially remove him. It also represented the importance of a single vote: President Johnson was acquitted and remained in office by a single vote cast in the Senate, the sitting jury.
The two incidents (one actual sea battle, and one questionable sea battle) allowed President Johnson (LBJ) to transition the Vietnam War from a guerrilla war into a conventional open war against Hanoi (Capital of North Vietnam).