Selected by lot from the citizens, were usually 500 strong, and represented a virtual opinion poll of the citizens.
The jurors were paid for their time.
The final arbiters of both guilt and punishment - there were no judges to interfere or try to dominate and no lawyers to manipulate..
lol
Trials in Athens and in the US both involve the presentation of evidence, arguments from both sides, and a judgment made by an impartial adjudicator or jury. Both systems aim to ensure a fair and just resolution to legal disputes.
beacause it would be easier to rape each other
300 members of the population were chosen at random from the citizen's list( there were approximately 6000 full citizens at any given time in Athens
All adult male citizens were eligible to vote , hold political office and serve on juries..
The citizens provided juries of 500 to hear disputes, and decided which way to go. There were no judges or lawyers.
Employment in juries, garrisons, public administration, councillors. Nearly half the adult male population was in some form of public employ.
Employment in juries, garrisons, public administration, councillors. Nearly half the adult male population was in some form of public employ.
No, the juries were usually of 500 people, with no judges or lawyers to interfere. With about 35,000 citizens, it was effectively an opinion poll in today's terms.
Grand juries and Petit juries are the two kinds of juries.
What are the in juries and disorcler of bones
The assembly of citizens ruled, making decisions. The council carried out the assembly's decisions. The courts of citizen juries ruled on legal matters - no judges or lawyers.