No, not unless the "expert" gave false testimony which would set the stage for an appeal by the either side. The purpose of having an expert witness testify in any case civil or criminal is to sway the jury to the side that is presenting the evidence, so the plaintiff would have no grounds to sue someone who presented factual, truthful claims.
The kind of damages a plaintiff can recover if a defendant's actions have been fraudulent, wanton, or outrageous depends on the damages to the plaintiff. If the actions are wanton, the damages tend to be higher than if they are simply fraudulent.
A plaintiff is a person who sues another. An example of the word plaintiff used in a sentence might be, "The plaintiff was suing the defendant over the broken lease and the alleged damages to the apartment."
Negligence
If the plaintiff ASKS for, or agrees to ACCEPT, an equitable remedy, this could be true statement.
Exemplary damages, also known as punitive damages, are additional compensation awarded to the plaintiff in a civil lawsuit to punish the defendant for egregious behavior and to deter future similar conduct. They are meant to go beyond simply compensating the plaintiff for losses suffered and to act as a form of punishment.
Punitive damages are monetary damages that are awarded to punish a defendant who either intentionally or recklessly injured the plaintiff.
When a plaintiff sues the federal government for monetary damages the Court of Federal Claims hears the case.
Contributory Negligence
Generally, the plaintiff in a civil case has the burden of proof. The plaintiff must provide enough evidence to convince a judge or jury that her claim should succeed and she should be awarded damages.
US Court of Federal Claims would hear those cases.
This is known as contributory negligence or comparative negligence. Contributory negligence applies when the plaintiff's own actions contributed to their injuries, potentially barring them from recovering any damages. Comparative negligence, on the other hand, allows for a partial recovery based on the degree of fault attributed to the plaintiff.
The "prayer amount" is the demand for a specific dollar amount of damages. At the ender of the allegations of a count of the complaint, plaintiff prays for jdgment in an amount of damages plaintiff thinks the case is worth. That is obsolete now as most suits now have a "demand amount" instead.