farmers
In theory (in the communist manifesto and Das Kapital) the people own everything. This was done in practice by means of production bring owned by the state in the name of the people
The means of production in Communism belong to the whole community.
farmers
A Communist Economy. ------ Socialism
The Communist system.
Both advocated state capitalism, where the government owns the means of production and most people still have to work for a wage. They did not stand for Communism, which means that abolition of the wages system and establishment of a classless society.
The people as a whole rather than private individuals.
The government owns everything. The people don't own anything. The government also tells people where to live, where to work, the government owns the newspapers, TV channels, and blocks internet access. In a communist government people do not have rights.
This is a question that would be inapplicable to a Communist society. Keeping in mind that these things are up for argument, think of the situation more like this: - Under capitalism, one could look at a factory (i.e., a piece of the means of production) and tell me who owns it. - In the transition from capitalism to Communism (which is what some socialists mean by the word socialism), one might say that "the people" or "the state" owns the factory. - In a Communist world, one might look at a factory, ask someone who owns it, and have that person answer "Own? What do you mean?" In other words, the concept of ownership, at least as it pertains to non-personal items, would be inapplicable.
Most parties that call themselves βcommunistβ in fact stand for state capitalism, where the state owns the means of production and most people still have to work for wages.
factors of production by govt. , by society and privetly
factors of production by govt. , by society and privetly
Socialism is a system where the means of production are owned and controlled by the society as a whole rather than by individuals. This can be achieved through government ownership, cooperative ownership, or a combination of both.
This is a question that would be inapplicable to a Communist society. Keeping in mind that these things are up for argument, think of the situation more like this: - Under capitalism, one could look at a factory (i.e., a piece of the means of production) and tell me who owns it. - In the transition from capitalism to Communism (which is what some socialists mean by the word socialism), one might say that "the people" or "the state" owns the factory. - In a Communist world, one might look at a factory, ask someone who owns it, and have that person answer "Own? What do you mean?" In other words, the concept of ownership, at least as it pertains to non-personal items, would be inapplicable.
State capitalism.