If he has probable cause to believe that a crime was committed, is being or will be committed, yes. That's true in any state.
Certainly. In many cases written consent would be difficult.
If the police have "probable cause"., meaning that they may believe there is something illegal, they can.
if an unlawful search of your property/residence/vehicle is conducted without your consent, and evidence of a crime is found, its an illegal search, the judge can throw out the evidence if an illegal search was done
deal with who can consent/object to a lawful search of a vehicle
It can be a legal search if probable cause exists, or with consent.
This would depend on the reason the car was searched in the first place, and the circumstances at the time of the second search. If permission is given to search (a consent search), the permission can be withdrawn. If the officers have not developed probable cause to continue searching, the search must stop. In the sceanario described, it is possible that probable cause developed to search the vehicle a second time. If so, then the search would be permissible. If the first search was by consent and the consent was not withdrawn, then one could argue that a consent search could resume two hours later.Additional: Also - if the vehicle was impounded and towed to a secure facility, an "inventory search' may be conducted to inventory. account for, and secure any property contained in the vehicle. However such an "inventory search" may not be used as a subterfuge for searching for, and seizing, any contraband or evidence which the vehicle may contain. For that purpose, a search warrant would still have to be applied for and granted.
The operator of the vehicle (driver) is legally responsible for the contents of the vehicle and can give consent to search the vehicle. As long as the consent was given voluntarily, not coerced, and the person consenting has actual or apparent authority over the vehicle. This is considered a "third-party consent scenario." The third-party driver of the vehicle can consent to a search while the owner is present as a passenger. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. at 186. A critical factor to consider is whether the owner/passenger objected to the search.So the question is: Did the owner/passenger object to the search?" If not, I don't think the owner has an argument.
A police officer must have either your consent, a warrent, or probable cause to search your vehicle - probable cause to search can include everything from a partially hidden weapon (gun), blood, body parts to just the cap of a alcohol container sticking up from a seat.
The law has the right to search a vehicle with or without a warrant.
An individual person cannot search your things without your consent. The only exception is if you implicitly consent. For example, if you go to a concert, you consent to obey the rules of the facility, which may include consenting to a brief search at the door.
Yes, a doctor certainly has the knowledge and skills to be able to carry out a search of body cavities. Usually it can not be done without your consent, but there are special circumstances in which a doctor may conduct the search without your consent.
If they have a warrant, they don't need to ask. It also depends on why and where they searched the car, but generally, no.