No! Sorry trying to figure out how many exact
Because the small states believed in the bill of rights which was stated in it
By making representation in the House of Representatives proportionate to population and representation in the Senate equal for each state
Northern states felt that representation in Congress should be based on the number of free people. Southern states believed that representation should be based on total population, which included slaves.
The two plans proposed to determine congressional representation and debated over at the Constitutional Convention were: The "Virginia Plan" or the "Large States Plan" This plan would benefit the larger states (Virginia, New York, the Carolinas, etc.) by making congressional representation proportional to the state's population. This would enable the more populous states to gain more representation, and thus more power in Congress. The "New Jersey Plan" or "Small States Plan" This plan prevented the smaller New England states from being swallowed by the larger states by making all representation equal. The larger states loudly protested that they deserved more representation, but the smaller states steadfastly refused to budge, and threatened to leave the fledgling union if their demands were not conceded to. The debate was eventually settled by The "Connecticut Compromise" or the "Great Compromise" Proposed by delegate Roger Sherman of Connecticut, this plan proposed a bicameral (two house) legislature. In one house (now the House of Representatives), representation would be based on population, while in the other house (now the Senate), each state would have an equal vote.
Unlike the Senate where every state receives two representatives, House representation is based on state population. So, more populated states would receive more representatives than less populated states.
Because the small states believed in the bill of rights which was stated in it
By making representation in the House of Representatives proportionate to population and representation in the Senate equal for each state
Big states are important for decision making because they have larger populations and therefore represent a larger portion of the country's citizens. The decisions made by big states can have a significant impact on national policies and outcomes. Additionally, big states often have diverse populations, which allows for a wider range of perspectives and considerations in decision making processes.
representation of large and small states
The smaller states followed the "Connecticut Plan" which, as opposed to the larger states' preference, the "Virginia Plan," made plans for a unicameral body in which all states had equal representation - today known as the Senate. The Virginia Plan, on the other hand, was favored by the larger states because it stated that larger populations would equal greater representation in Congress - today known as the House of Representatives.
situational ethics
Evaluation of alternatives
unequal representation of smaller states
The Representation Compromise gave both large states and small states the type of representation they asked for. This was done by changing the representation standards in the houses of Congress. Large states had wanted representation based on population. This standard was accepted in the House of Representatives, which allowed the number of representatives to be determined by state population. Smaller states wanted equal representation, despite population size. This was accepted by the Senate, in which all states have the same number of representatives.
what is the principle of limiting factor in decision making. The principle of the limiting factor states that by recognising and overcoming those factors that stand critically in the way of a goal, the best alternative course of action can be selected.
dynamic ethics
montgomery