The two plans proposed to determine congressional representation and debated over at the Constitutional Convention were: The "Virginia Plan" or the "Large States Plan" This plan would benefit the larger states (Virginia, New York, the Carolinas, etc.) by making congressional representation proportional to the state's population. This would enable the more populous states to gain more representation, and thus more power in Congress. The "New Jersey Plan" or "Small States Plan" This plan prevented the smaller New England states from being swallowed by the larger states by making all representation equal. The larger states loudly protested that they deserved more representation, but the smaller states steadfastly refused to budge, and threatened to leave the fledgling union if their demands were not conceded to. The debate was eventually settled by The "Connecticut Compromise" or the "Great Compromise" Proposed by delegate Roger Sherman of Connecticut, this plan proposed a bicameral (two house) legislature. In one house (now the House of Representatives), representation would be based on population, while in the other house (now the Senate), each state would have an equal vote.
The Constitutional Convention was held at Independence Hall, in Philadelphia.
The Connecticut Compromise -Apex
THE Constitutional Convention in 1787 was to replace the Articles of Confederation with a stronger governing document.
The debate about slavery at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 centered on how to address the institution in the new Constitution, reflecting deep divisions between Northern and Southern states. Southern delegates sought to protect slavery and ensure representation for enslaved individuals in Congress through mechanisms like the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for apportionment purposes. In contrast, many Northern delegates aimed to limit the expansion of slavery and sought to prevent it from being enshrined in the new framework of government. Ultimately, the compromises made during the convention laid the groundwork for ongoing tensions over slavery that would eventually lead to the Civil War.
The Secrecy rule said that the convention had to be held in secret and no outside sources could know what was being debated inside the convention. It helped delegates talk freely without the threat of media attention or possibly losing their political careers due to votes or subject matter they addressed.
Organization and function to the executive branch
The Constitutional Convention was held at Independence Hall, in Philadelphia.
The competing of small and large state
They decided to let Congress elect the President.
The 2 most important rules of the Constitutional Convention were that the discussions would be kept secret and that delegates could reopen any issue for later debate. These rules facilitated relatively free and open discussion.
The Connecticut Compromise -Apex
The Founding Fathers used debate and compromise to solve problems at the Constitutional Convention. The convention was held in 1787.
Constitutional convention refers to a gathering of delegates to revise or draft a new constitution. It is a formal assembly where representatives come together to discuss and propose changes to the existing constitutional framework. These conventions provide an opportunity for the public and political leaders to debate and shape the fundamental laws of a nation.
dont no
THE Constitutional Convention in 1787 was to replace the Articles of Confederation with a stronger governing document.
If by founding fathers you mean delegates to the Constitutional Convention then the answer is yes. there was a great deal of vigorous debate over what form the new government should take and everybody had to compromise on something. Ultimately only thirty nine of the delegates actually signed the Constitution. Michael Montagne
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from southern states and those from northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The debate was over if, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for constitutional purposes.