0
In the Indian caste system is there social mobility up and down the ladder?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
In the traditional Indian Caste System, social mobility was very limited and typically only allowed through marriage. However, with the abolition of untouchability and the establishment of affirmative action policies, there has been some improvement in social mobility in modern Indian society.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How does social mobility operate in three forms of stratification?
In the caste system, social mobility is extremely limited as it is determined by birth and deeply ingrained social norms. In the class system, social mobility is relatively fluid, with individuals able to move up or down the social ladder based on factors like education, occupation, and wealth. In the meritocracy system, social mobility is based on merit and individual achievement, where those with skills and talents have the greatest opportunity to advance regardless of their background.
Is there social mobility up and down the ladder in India caste system?
The caste system in India traditionally lacks social mobility, as individuals are born into a specific caste and are expected to adhere to its social roles and occupations. However, efforts are being made to promote social mobility and equality through affirmative action policies such as reservations in education and employment for historically disadvantaged castes. Despite these measures, social mobility remains limited for many lower caste individuals.
What was the Indian social structure called?
The Indian social structure was called the caste system, which divided society into hierarchical groups based on occupation and ancestry. This system determined a person's social status and opportunities in life, with limited mobility between castes.
How does our social system in America today compare or contrast with the Caste system of India?
The social system in America is based on ideals of equality and individual opportunity, whereas the caste system in India is a hereditary, hierarchical social stratification that historically restricted social mobility based on birth. While both systems aim to organize society, the American system is more open and allows for more social mobility compared to the rigid structure of the Indian caste system.
Was there social mobility in the feudal system?
Social mobility in the feudal system was limited. Typically, individuals were born into a particular social class and had little opportunity to move between classes. However, in some cases, exceptional individuals could rise in status through military prowess or service to a lord.
How does social mobility operate in three forms of stratification?
In the caste system, social mobility is extremely limited as it is determined by birth and deeply ingrained social norms. In the class system, social mobility is relatively fluid, with individuals able to move up or down the social ladder based on factors like education, occupation, and wealth. In the meritocracy system, social mobility is based on merit and individual achievement, where those with skills and talents have the greatest opportunity to advance regardless of their background.
Is there social mobility up and down the ladder in India caste system?
The caste system in India traditionally lacks social mobility, as individuals are born into a specific caste and are expected to adhere to its social roles and occupations. However, efforts are being made to promote social mobility and equality through affirmative action policies such as reservations in education and employment for historically disadvantaged castes. Despite these measures, social mobility remains limited for many lower caste individuals.
What was the Indian social structure called?
The Indian social structure was called the caste system, which divided society into hierarchical groups based on occupation and ancestry. This system determined a person's social status and opportunities in life, with limited mobility between castes.
How does our social system in America today compare or contrast with the Caste system of India?
The social system in America is based on ideals of equality and individual opportunity, whereas the caste system in India is a hereditary, hierarchical social stratification that historically restricted social mobility based on birth. While both systems aim to organize society, the American system is more open and allows for more social mobility compared to the rigid structure of the Indian caste system.
What did the caste system of India do?
Answer this question…It limited social mobility.
The caste system in India was characterized by?
lack of social mobility
Which Roman institution is most similar to the Indian caste system?
The Roman institution that is most similar to the Indian caste system is the Roman class system. In both societies, individuals were born into a particular social status that determined their opportunities and restrictions in life. This led to a rigid hierarchy and limited social mobility.
The effect of the caste system is to create a society that?
that has little to no social mobility
What did the caste system of ancient India do?
Answer this question…It limited social mobility.
Was there social mobility in the feudal system?
Social mobility in the feudal system was limited. Typically, individuals were born into a particular social class and had little opportunity to move between classes. However, in some cases, exceptional individuals could rise in status through military prowess or service to a lord.
What is the major characteristic of the class system of stratification?
The major characteristic of the class system of stratification is that individuals can move between different social classes based on factors such as education, occupation, and wealth. This system is more fluid compared to other forms of stratification, allowing for more social mobility.
Did the opportunity for social mobility exist in ancient Rome?
Yes! Trimalchio's story suggests social mobility. The system rewarded hard work, ambition and the accumulation of wealth, but there were limits.
