no
The caste system in India has historically influenced social hierarchy and segregation within villages. It determines social status, occupation, and opportunities for individuals based on their caste. This system can lead to discrimination, unequal access to resources, and limited social mobility within village communities.
cast system is buy birth social class system is monitary in social class you can move up cast you can not
The caste system in India was established over thousands of years based on Hindu beliefs and social norms. It is not attributed to any single person or event, but rather evolved organically within Indian society. The system categorizes people into different social groups based on their birth and origins.
caste
India's caste system is different from the Aryan social class because the Indian's marriages were only permitted only between persons of the same class. I hope I was a help!
Answer this question…It limited social mobility.
lack of social mobility
Answer this question…It limited social mobility.
social
The slave social ladder: look at the caste systems in India
Both countries operate under a caste system. The system in India was strict and prohibited other classes from interacting with each other while Chinaâ??s social system did not demonstrate a formal and strict social ladder.
Rabindranath Tagore, winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1913, was among the lowest on the social ladder as a poet from India.
To be frank, the idea that social mobility could never happen in any case is a fallacy. Social mobility can and always does happen even where it's restricted. This is because we really cannot completely control the social interactions of people. That's not a very helpful answer to you question though. For a better answer, let's look at places where social mobility is marginal at best. Take India, for example, which has historically had poor social mobility because of its caste system. At the bottom of the caste system you have a class of people known as the untouchables. I'm no expert on sociology nor the history of India, but India has a huge wealth disparity and a lot of social problems because of its caste system. There have been repeated calls to end the caste system. When social mobility is restricted you get huge wealth disparities and socio-economic problems. You get an under-educated population and a small middle class (because the lower-classes cannot easily move into this class of people). If social mobility never happened, implying that everyone was static and their class was, say, determined at birth - I think this would merely breed conflict. Think of the aristocracy that was challenged by peasants during the French Revolution. It was called a revolution because change came of it. If change did not come of it, the violence would simply have been senseless - that's why I think it's infeasible to think of people never being socially mobile. You can take social mobility by force, if you must.
Factors such as urbanization, globalization, education, economic development, and government policies promoting social equality have contributed to weakening the caste system in India. These changes have led to increased social mobility and a decline in the rigidities associated with caste-based discrimination.
The caste system in India was established over thousands of years based on Hindu beliefs and social norms. It is not attributed to any single person or event, but rather evolved organically within Indian society. The system categorizes people into different social groups based on their birth and origins.
yes if they obey all rules they can be reincarnated into a higher caste. women can only be reincarnated into an animal if all rules are obeyed.
caste