The burden is on the tenant to prove that they paid.
Landlord, but probably only once a year. The landlord should have a tech check the filters.
a real-estate attorney or an attorney who specializes in landlord-tenant laws
You would need evidence of an open and obvious condition (photos of the dead tree on the car would work) or evidence of written or verbal notice to the landlord about the hazard (dead tree). Without that evidence your chances of prevailing are zero. If its a small loss - put it into small claims - insurer may pay at that point
There are Landlord and Tenant Laws in Arizona. Two points are that the landlord is required to give you an itemized list of things you have to pay for after moving out--within 14 days. If the list seems extreme, you can go to small claims court to try to get the charges removed. However, you'll need backup information: the list that you filled out and signed when you moved in, affadavits from people who helped you move as to the condition of the place and so on.
Yes my sister broke her lease due to a medical issue. You need to explain your problem to your landlord and chances are he will let you out of your lease. If he doesn't, go to landlords and tenants court and ask for a show cause petition to break a lease. Have documentation supporting your claims.
Yes. If a landlord later determines that you damaged his property he can take you to court. A landlord is not required to assess damages under the deposit if they would prefer to return your deposit and sue you for more. The deposit laws are generally intended to avoid lawsuits from every landlord at the end of every tenancy.
Go to small claims court.
Oregon law. yes but only if it is beyond normal wear and tear. within 31 days after termination of the tenancy landlord must give a written statement for the specific claims.
Yes, the landlord is responsible. But keep in mind that this is not a landlord/tenant issue: it's a small claims issue. So this is heard in a small claims court inquired, not a landlord/tenant court.
No. Connecticut no longer recognizes tenancy by the entirety. A deed to two persons as T by E will now create a joint tenancy which is a form of ownership that is subject to claims of creditors. See C.G.S. section 14-14a.
No, that would be theft. The appropriate avenue for recovering the deposit is to file a small claims suit against the landlord.
Landlord Property Insurance is insurance that a landlord should have on any properties that he or she owns. Landlord insurance will protect the landlord from any damage that may happen to the property as well as any liability claims that may be made against the Landlord.
Landlord, but probably only once a year. The landlord should have a tech check the filters.
If this helps any, a landlord is no different in terms of small claims or other civil court matter. If there are grounds to sue then you may do so. Check your state's Statute of Limitations laws to see how much time you have to sue a landlord or anyone else. Landlord and Tenant issues are only applicable to eviction proceedings, not small-claims court or other civil courts.
You would have to go to Small Claims Court and get a judgment against the tenant. Then you could garnish the security deposit from the current landlord. Talk with an attorney for details.
If you received permission to paint the property from the landlord, you're obligated to return the apartment in the same condition as it was given to you. That means the paint on the walls too. So yes, even if you received permission to paint, you're still obligated to return it to as close as possible to the original wall color.If, however, you did not paint the premises at all and the landlord is demanding you pay for repainting for the next tenants enjoyment, that may be a huge no. The landlord cannot expect tenants to repaint after the duration of their tenancy. Minor paint damage (areas of peeling, knicks in the paint, nail holes, etc) are typically defined as ordinary wear and tare. As such, they're exempt from damage claims.
The burden is on the perpetrator, NOT the victim.