In both world wars there were women who had to use guns in self protection or as secret agents of the OSS (forerunner of the CIA) or as agents of the Underground Resistance Networks. Unfortunately, some used them in revenge. There were no infantry women with guns.
Guns aren't wrong, they are dangerous because people in the world find them and don't think and shoot them and kill people for no reason. I believe people we actually Know what they are doing deserve a gun should have the ability to use it, but for good not bad. So, hopefully you see a that guns aren't wrong they are just dangerous with people that don't know what they are doing.
yea it did change the world by letting us use guns if we didnt have this we could not use guns. SO BE THANKFULL
Untrained people should not use guns or any other dangerous tool as unintentional injury may occur to the user or others around them
The could not fight in combat. The women in the military could learn to use guns but they could not fight in the front lines. They were also not supposed to get pregnant, esp. out of wedlock.
Your question strikes the heart of a very long and heavily-debated issue in politics. Guns are, in no way, dangerous. An ignorant, careless, or dangerous person with a gun is, however, dangerous. The person is dangerous. Guns cause harm to people in the same ways that pens misspell words.
Guns
what are the three dangerous weapons used in world war1?
guns, tanks
No- but PEOPLE can USE them in a dangerous manner. A pellet gun CAN produce injuries, or in rare cases, death. They are not toys, should not be treated as toys, and should be used by people that are mature enough to use them in a responsible manner.
Pistols, rifles, machine guns, mortars, artillery and other cannon.
Machine guns were in use BEFORE WW 1. They were around for the entire war.
There are many women in the world.