The Anti-Federalists thought the U.S. Constitution granted too much power to the federal government. They also thought this power threatened the state sovereignty.
i think Rihanna has too many tatoos
a star in her ear
an eagle
an illuminati godess
shh
love
more stars
a scole
like 5 quotes
a arabian face
a gun
something on her hand
and many more
The Anti-Federalists thought the U.S. Constitution granted too much power to the federal government. They also thought this power threatened the state sovereignty.
They argued for a strong federal government and that a strong federal gov was the only way to save the country.
Amend the constitution APEX
the way the amendments demonstrate the ability of the constitution to adapt to in attitude about who should vote is by doing it.
The Anti Federalist wanted a state bank due to the fact that they were against the National Bank. They believed that the state should have the power to the bank, and by having a National Bank, the National govermenet would be gaining to much power.
They burned it, burning things is the best way to get your point across
Patrick Henry was an Anti-Federalist because he was strongly against the Constitution. He didn't like the fact that it didn't have a Bill Of Rights for the states, and he feared that it gave the government way too much power. He thought that it would trample the rights of the states.
· The Federalist position on the adoption of the Constitution was the argument of the difficulties facing the Republic which could be overcome only by the new government based on the proposed Constitution.
I agree with the federalists because they are supporting the government. On the other hand, why agree with people who are going against government matters? The federalists are sticking up for what is right and for what we need. That's a great way to repay them for standing by our side
The Constitution offered a framework for establishing the new government, and the Federalist Papers explained the reasoning behind the Constitution.
the bill of rights
== == Those people who favored ratifying the new United States Constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation were called Federalists, because the new Constitution created a federal type of government. Those people who did not favor ratification of the new Constitution were called Anti-Federalists. Many well known "founding fathers" were Anti-Federalists. Sam Adams opposed the new Constitution until the Massachusetts Federalists agreed to demand a national Bill of Rights to be added to the Constitution. Patrick Henry of Virginia was a noted Anti-Federalist, who changed his mind in later years. He became a strong supporter of George Washington, John Adams and the Federalists' cause.
The only way the Anti-feds would agree with the Constitution was if all rights were listed. This would grant every citizen undeniable freedoms.
I agree with the federalists because they are supporting the government. On the other hand, why agree with people who are going against government matters? The federalists are sticking up for what is right and for what we need. That's a great way to repay them for standing by our side
The Anti-Federalists felt as though it went against the democratic goals of the American Revolution and took a step back to the European way of monarch and aristocracy. They thought that the document heavily favoured those already wealthy, in part because it was created by a group of learned, wealthy men.
1. Slavery (specific to the way it should be written in the Constitution) 2. The need for a Bill of Rights 3. Weaknesses in Articles of Confederation (could they be revised to avoid writing a completely new document aka the Constitution? or are they impossible to work with?) 4. Legality of the actual writing of the Constitution (conference was actually supposed to be used to revise the articles, but instead was clandestine and involved the writing of an entirely new document)
When he died he was the last person to have been involved in the writing of the constitution. After him no one could ask why something was written the way it was.
it was controversial because the Anti-Federalists hated the constitution but this was the only way they wouldn't agree to it, if the Federalists put on this Bill of Rights that were not mentioned in the constitution.