You are probably thinking of Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832), a case before the Marshall Court, in which eleven missionaries were arrested and sentenced to four years hard labor for living on Cherokee land without the requisite Georgia state permit.
The two missionaries most often named were Samuel Austin Worcester and Elizur Butler; however, historians note nine other missionaries were arrested at the same time (some accounts claim only seven).
Numerous Supreme Court cases address the rights of people arrested and charged with crimes.
No it was not a supreme court case, but a state case because it was held in the local court
The Supreme Court case that directly involved white missionaries aiding the Cherokee is Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831). In this case, the Cherokee Nation sought to assert its sovereignty and protect its rights against state encroachments, with missionaries like Samuel Worcester supporting their cause. The Court ultimately ruled that the Cherokee Nation was a "domestic dependent nation," which limited their ability to assert sovereignty but acknowledged their rights. This case set the stage for further legal battles over Native American rights and state authority.
A case on appeal reaches the supreme court if the judges below them cant handle it or that case specifically but it is very hard to get a case on appeal in the supreme court
chapman won the supreme court case
who decides whether or not the supreme court will review a case
What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?
Yes, you can appeal to the Supreme Court in this case if you believe there was a legal error in the lower court's decision.
There is no case that set up the Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court was required under Article III of the Constitution; Congress created it with the Judiciary Act of 1789.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)