answersLogoWhite

0

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)

User Avatar

Nick Parker

Lvl 13
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What supreme court case protects a person being arrested?

Numerous Supreme Court cases address the rights of people arrested and charged with crimes.


The MIranda decision of the supreme court concerned?

The Miranda decision of the Supreme Court was concerned with police informed the accused of their rights when they are arrested. They are called Miranda Rights.


How did the supreme court defend the application of the First Amendment to the states?

Gitlow v. New York


Why was the Miranda vs Arizona case brought to the supreme court?

Miranda stated he didn't know his rights that are given in the 14th amendment, so the Supreme Court found that the police need to inform a person of their rights when they are arrested. Hence, the Miranda decision.


What was the name of the 1966 Supreme Court case which defended the rights of those being arrested?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)


What was the name of the 1966 supreme court case which defends the rights of those being arrested?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)


What was the name of the 1966 supreme court case which defended the rights those being arrested?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)


What Supreme Court case stated that suspects need to be advised of their constitutional rights when they are arrested?

There is no requirement to advise arrested persons of their rights. The trigger for advice or rights under Miranda V Arizona is 'custodial interrogation'. A person arrested but not questioned is usually not advised of rights, but a person who is being questioned and is not free to leave, whether or not they are arrested must be advised.


Which court is responsible for enforcement of fundamental rights?

supreme court and high court


How have the US Supreme Court decisions about state rights changed over time?

How have the supreme court has changes


What challenges have advances in technology posed for supreme court justices trying to interpret the bill of rights?

There were a few challenges that have advances in technology for Supreme court. This was what interpret the Bill of Rights.


Who is the protectar of fundamental right?

supreme cort is the protector of funda mental rights.