Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Numerous Supreme Court cases address the rights of people arrested and charged with crimes.
The Miranda decision of the Supreme Court was concerned with police informed the accused of their rights when they are arrested. They are called Miranda Rights.
Gitlow v. New York
Miranda stated he didn't know his rights that are given in the 14th amendment, so the Supreme Court found that the police need to inform a person of their rights when they are arrested. Hence, the Miranda decision.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
There is no requirement to advise arrested persons of their rights. The trigger for advice or rights under Miranda V Arizona is 'custodial interrogation'. A person arrested but not questioned is usually not advised of rights, but a person who is being questioned and is not free to leave, whether or not they are arrested must be advised.
supreme court and high court
How have the supreme court has changes
There were a few challenges that have advances in technology for Supreme court. This was what interpret the Bill of Rights.
supreme cort is the protector of funda mental rights.